Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Дата: 30.08.2012 16:14:06
teamoldmill, on Aug 23 2012 - 21:59, said: Why do the developers continue to ignore the incredible
disadvantage high tier German armor has with camo?Vallter: Because they have other advantages. And I doubt that Maus could
have great camouflage values. It's house size vehicle. I doubt that
it would be difficult to find it within 400 range.
For big size they receive other advantages.
For big size they receive other advantages.
Deusmortis, on Aug 23 2012 - 22:07, said: The E's gun is slightly faster, with slightly higher accuracy, and
a bit faster aim time. Also, the vehicle is a bit
tougher, turns faster, and has a higher top speed. Not
completely sure if those changes are enough to justify the higher
tier, but that's the way things stand right now.Gold HE round has a larger splash range.
Vallter: Yes, this is correct.
tankduke1, on Aug 23 2012 - 22:13, said: Will you change super pershing starting position on westfield map
so that it is always with the heavy tanks instead of at the bottom
of the hill?Vallter: We will discuss this suggestions, though it's Q'n'A thread.
BuubyTrap, on Aug 23 2012 - 22:52, said: Vallter, you stated that only certain maps will get physics and
rendering right away. Is it safe to assume that only the ones
currently available on the Physics Server will be implementing
these changes when 0.8.0 actually comes out, or are there others in
the works that we just haven't seen yet?Vallter: The ones that are on test and Lakeville.
Noggmoritz, on Aug 23 2012 - 23:10, said: Why won't WG give us a different turret design (mausturm or
henschel) for the E-100 when the vast majority of players prefer
it, as demonstrated repeatedly in polls on these forums and EU/RU?
Unlike the Jagdpanzer E100, the cooler designs are *not* owned by a
model company.Vallter: Because one Maus in-game is enough.
ulrikov, on Aug 24 2012 - 00:21, said: Are you planning to overhaul maps on assault to make it
"challenging" for "both" attackers and defenders?I've made a suggestion regarding this one in here: http://forum.worldof...s/#entry2508781
Besides the passive buff on armour, what other buffs are you planning for the IS4M on the next update? Would it be plausible to get IS7's gun and mount it on the IS4M, just like before?
Say if the E-100 underperforms still on the test server #1, what are the chances of WG going to buff gun pen and overhaul these cosmetic buffs for this obsolete E-100?
Vallter: They are currently both challenging. With good platoon I rarely
lose on Assault and more on Defence (we like active style of
gameplay). Maps that were not balance, were removed. But we will
consider players suggestions and overall feedback to improve game
modes in future.
IS-4 won't receive any buffs. No, it won't be able to mount the turret.
There is a chance that we will rethink the buff.
IS-4 won't receive any buffs. No, it won't be able to mount the turret.
There is a chance that we will rethink the buff.
Death187, on Aug 24 2012 - 00:39, said: So far I have been told that it was the XVM mod and that I should
uninstall it lol.Vallter: Reply you've received:
'Thank you for providing us with that report.
We can see that you are running some custom mods in your game client; we recommend that you remove or delete those custom mods as they can cause a lot of different problems with our game.
We have forwarded this information to our colleagues and have initiated an investigation into the matter. Any problems found will be resolved in one of our upcoming patches.
If we require any further information to help us investigate then we will request it.
Thank you again for bringing this to our attention'
You've received general recommendation about the safety of your game. I would suggest re-opining the system and receiving explanation, since issue should have been investigated already.
'Thank you for providing us with that report.
We can see that you are running some custom mods in your game client; we recommend that you remove or delete those custom mods as they can cause a lot of different problems with our game.
We have forwarded this information to our colleagues and have initiated an investigation into the matter. Any problems found will be resolved in one of our upcoming patches.
If we require any further information to help us investigate then we will request it.
Thank you again for bringing this to our attention'
You've received general recommendation about the safety of your game. I would suggest re-opining the system and receiving explanation, since issue should have been investigated already.
masterzjg, on Aug 24 2012 - 01:03, said: 2 questions.Did these question threads completely replace the YAWR's?
When buffing and nerfing a tank, do you take into account the average win rate of the driver of the tank? After all, if 55% win rate people are driving a tank, it would make the tank seem overpowered, but it's the drivers skill.
Vallter: YAWR transforred into 'ASAP' video series, so they replaced this
bulletin.
We take in count complex statistics, which include many paratemers aside of W/R to exclude such thing as skill of the player group from it. Moreover, overally amount of good players on the vehicle is always balanced by amount of bad players on this vehicle.
We take in count complex statistics, which include many paratemers aside of W/R to exclude such thing as skill of the player group from it. Moreover, overally amount of good players on the vehicle is always balanced by amount of bad players on this vehicle.
Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era