Ridge512, on Jul 26 2012 - 17:48, said: Do you guys try to keep the tanks performance in game to match that
of them in real life or are you guys trying to make all the tanks
even? I know you guys work hard and I really like this game. But
all the buffing and nerfing of tanks makes me wonder what your
motives behind them are. Will all the buffing and nerfing
eventually quiet down?
Vallter: We try to be close to historical reality in the mean of vehicle
models, tactics, maps, tanks main purposes and characteristics, but
the last are often change to the sake of game balance. Moreover, we
always choose game balance, if we have to make a choice between it
and hostprical accuracy. This ensure fun game for all.
LoStRoC, on Jul 26 2012 - 17:49, said: Vallter, WG has severly nerfed the performance of the 100mm French
premium ammunition(45mm!).
Vallter: Unfortunately, this Premium content will be overperforming in the
reality of 7.5 update, thus we had to make a hard decision and nerf
it. It's a very rare exclusion from our policy. This is one of the
reasons why we have given to you almost a weekly notice - this will
allow you to use them in current state during battles.
BlueHusky, on Jul 26 2012 - 17:56, said: There are two guns to be researched if you have the Lorraine
currently. If I research BOTH guns, will I keep any of them after
the update-- or will there be only one gun for the Lorraine after
the update? I understand from reading the update that the OCA 45
will be gone, how about the other gun? The one that takes 34k xp to
get.
Vallter: The other gun will remain on Lorraine.
TheFlyingPig, on Jul 26 2012 - 19:23, said: All I noticed was this "KV-5 removed form the in-game shop"

Edit:oh and this "Due to MatchMaker changes, parameters of
gollowing USSR Medium tanks and TD’s were rebalanced: Т-28,
Т-34-85, Т-43, КV-13, SU-85" so many misspellings.
Vallter: Thank you for watchfulness. All typo's fixed.
Panzerleiter, on Jul 26 2012 - 19:51, said: Since there are so many grammar corrections in this thread: When
you talk about durability decreases, as in, " Durability increased
on 100 HP", it should be, "Durability increased by 100 HP".
Vallter: They have a good profitability for the vehicles of their Tier. We
do not think that they need any buff of income or reduction of
repair cost.
gregm, on Jul 26 2012 - 19:52, said: What about tetrach and t 127? They need some cred income buffs
since Thier special and premium!!!!!
Vallter: Though the problem is client side and we cannpt influence that much
on it, I can assure you that we are trying to find a solution to
implement this fix automatically to all our players.
Paladin1, on Jul 26 2012 - 10:18, said: Vallter, from personal experience with this issue, and still having
ongoing problems... I don't see how this explanation is correct. I
HAVE contacted support with a lengthy over 2 week ticket, got the
"fix", and there is still issues.... If it were because
of temporary files on my computer, once the "fix" was initiated it
should have fixed the problem, but it hasn't for my clan. Fixing my
files worked for me, but EVERY clan member had to do the fix to get
the emblems back. Still to this date, new players accepted into the
clan have to use the fix to have our emblem. Getting a clan emblem
was automatic before when you joined the clan, it just appeared on
your tank. There were no problems with the emblems in my clan until
I changed the emblem, that is when the issues started and they did
not appear. Prior to that ALL new members had the emblem working
for them as soon as they joined. So something that was working
automatically, is not working automatically now. If it were
something with temporary files, you would think there would be
something added to game code during an update so people don't have
to go in and "tinker" with their pc's files (not everyone is
comfortable messing with internal files or even knowledgable).
Vallter: 1)CtD issue happened only on some PC configuration and not on
all.
2)I would suggest to check your ISP connection
3)This feature of the gameplay was in since release. It's the game
sence.
4)It was tested on the Public Test server, which has quite similar
population.
kingbright, on Jul 26 2012 - 20:49, said: ???
They introduced a crash-to-desktop with 7.4, which didn't happend
on the test server. The fix for that was published yesterday, after
several weeks, just before the new patch comes out.
They introduced serious lag problems during many hours of a day
which wasn't the case on the test server.
They introduced this frustrating penetration-no damage feature.
They will introduce a new matchmaker which wasn't tested at all on
the NA server and its population. We have to see how this will work
out during a typical day. I'm sure it works fine with many players
online ...
Vallter: Hmm... KV-2 would or a T95 with Maus amount of HP... Hmmmm....
Keckers, on Jul 26 2012 - 22:22, said: Agreed. A date based tier ranking with similar HP for all tanks
based on volume/mass size and NOT a tank's tier, would
mean that a Hetzer (available in 1944) could fight against an IS
and NOT LOSE JUST BECAUSE IT HAS FEWER HIT POINTS!
Vallter: For such way of gameplay TD are present in our game. A TD+SPG
mutant is neither close to reality nor something that can enter the
gameplay.
Keckers, on Jul 26 2012 - 23:41, said: Also, to make the game more historical the dispersion values for
ALL arty in an indirect fire mode should be raised by at least
20%...in direct fire not, in fact in direct fire some arty should
get a zoom like a tank's especiially if the optics are there and
the muzzle velocity is high enough for direct fire!
Vallter: No, it will not.
mp31b30q9, on Jul 27 2012 - 00:57, said: "Fixed the description and conditions for obtaining Fadin's
medal."
Will it effect previous awards?
Vallter: Next week, most probably.
DavidN28, on Jul 27 2012 - 02:04, said: Could someone tell me what "soon" means? They said that they are
gonna release 7.5 soon. Does it mean 1 week? couple weeks? couple
months?
Vallter: