T110 and M103 feedback topic

Preditorian, on Mar 19 2012 - 14:59, said: I would like to address a few things with your post sir.


Preditorian, on Mar 19 2012 - 14:59, said: First thing you say is "I have completed reading this... .", as to say there is not anymore useful information or feedback to come from this thread. How are you going to back up what you say in the remainder of you post about the thread and what, or what is not considered actually feedback when you start off saying that? It may or may not have been your intention, but it is how it was received, and perception is everything.


Preditorian, on Mar 19 2012 - 14:59, said: On your first section that is labeled 1, .....then would it not matter what measures are put into effect to raise profits?


Preditorian, on Mar 19 2012 - 14:59, said: on number 2, ... whining is a form of opinion, just a poorly expressed one.


Preditorian, on Mar 19 2012 - 14:59, said: Number 3 is understandable due to some immature players, but I ask that you still keep in mind as to what they are, opinions. (poorly expressed)


Preditorian, on Mar 19 2012 - 14:59, said: Number 4 is based on the lack of confirmation that peoples feedback is reaching the development teams.


Preditorian, on Mar 19 2012 - 14:59, said: I myself have lost all hope in the game, and as such, will be leaving for good once my prem runs out.


Preditorian, on Mar 19 2012 - 14:59, said: I sincerely hope that you take this not as a rage post or complaint,


luminarium, on Mar 19 2012 - 15:06, said: Thank you for taking your time to respond to this thread. This is the very first sign that the feedback is passed on to the developers. You have to understand that (in customer relationship) perception is reality. Without your feedback many of the players would think that threads like this are only a gimmick - you have given us hope that the developers do take our opinions into consideration.


EmGee42, on Mar 19 2012 - 15:59, said: Vallter,
I understand, I think most of us understand, that Wargamming is here to make money and I think most people here don't have a problem with that and want the game to succeed. Where we have a problem is communication and lack of representation. The North American players have to get our information second or third hand as translated from the Russian or European groups. We don't have devs come here and tell us that they are looking at our issues or that our opinions are valued. All we are asking for is to be heard and get some feedback from devs.
If there is not a NA server rep with direct communication to Wargamming, wouldn't it be wise place somebody in that position?


FaustianQ, on Mar 19 2012 - 16:38, said: 1


Prat, on Mar 19 2012 - 17:43, said: Vallter,
respectfully I will have to disagree with you on the topic of "Whining". A lot (I'll go as far as "most") of the feedback was pretty well thought out, constructive and to the point. People like Faustian, Spectre and others have voiced valid arguments for improving the vehicles beyond their current iteration.


Prat, on Mar 19 2012 - 17:43, said: "What is the role of the T110 heavy tank in CW, public games and overall".
Regards,
P.


fritz3d, on Mar 19 2012 - 18:29, said: Or to illustrate it better, you can play any of these tanks in a way that can make you go "I LOVE THIS THING".


NotAnotherForumTroll, on Mar 19 2012 - 18:38, said: Serb is a troll ... or very unpleasant person..