Players Questions and Developers Answers
Дата: 12.12.2011 15:29:39
wildcat18, on Dec 08 2011 - 15:56, said: Not sure where to ask this but if i already have the top motor and
gun on my T44 will i have to research the new motor and gun or will
i get it automaticly?Vallter: You will have to research the motor, since it will be a new
one.
You won't have to research the LB-1 gun, if you have it researched for T-54
You won't have to research the LB-1 gun, if you have it researched for T-54
FaustianQ, on Dec 09 2011 - 19:50, said: Why, yet again, are you still ignoring my question Valter? Is
Wargaming trying to save face here by simply ignoring me?Vallter: As you may see we currently have many investigations regarding the
matter. We will provide you information, once it will be finished
and ready!
The_Chieftain, on Dec 09 2011 - 20:10, said: If it's the T110 question, leave that one to me. I intend to get an
answer as well.Vallter: Can you please give references on that vehicle? Just to avoid any
misunderstandings between us.
bohohoyo, on Dec 10 2011 - 21:00, said: Can the developers bring the T-606 into the game? This would be a
great tank for the game and is big enough to be a MEDIUM Tank.- Bohohoyo [DFR]
Vallter: Personally, I use 105mm Derp gun. Though it has longer reloading
time, it deals tons of damage. But it's more difficult to handle.
I
Also I would suggest you to try all guns and find out, which one suits you more
Also you can search 'American Vehicles' Forum section to find some players' opinions on the matter.
Also I would suggest you to try all guns and find out, which one suits you more
Also you can search 'American Vehicles' Forum section to find some players' opinions on the matter.
yuting, on Dec 11 2011 - 02:48, said: I have a question regarding The M1A2 and 105-mm Derp gun. What are
the advantages and disadvantages of the two (I have an E2 and
wondering which gun I should mount.)?Vallter: 1 - personally, I do not ask to suspend anyone in the threads.
Moderators are constantly monitoring the threads and see rules to
be followed. And I'm very glad they do this and I'm also grateful
for their volunteer activity.
2 - yes, there are realistic references.
3 - glad that you continue asking questions and stay with us!
2 - yes, there are realistic references.
3 - glad that you continue asking questions and stay with us!
Hirumaru, on Dec 12 2011 - 13:57, said: Hmph! 10 day suspension -- not RO -- by a very overzealous,
heavy-handed wannabe supermod, ambiguously citing "the rules"
without mentioning which specifically were violating. Ah, I love
knowing when I've hit a nerve. 
Vallter, that the symbol of the hammer and sickle is whitewashed doesn't mean it isn't being flown on your flag, or at least the flags of those who seek to "keep the peace" . . .
At any rate, now that that dirty laundry is being aired out properly, here is the actual question:
Is there any intent to remove the RIDICULOUS mechanic of having an engine catch fire from a transmission hit? Is there any evidence at all of a tank being undone in actual combat by it's transmission fluids catching fire from the impact of a shell? Any at all? Has Overlord supplied any citation of sources since this question was first asked more than a year ago, or will this mechanic remain simply because it would be "radical" to remove such a silly thing from a game that likes to take itself too seriously?
Have a wonderful day,
Love and huggles,
The bane of your bullshitting,
-Hiru
Vallter:
World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Players Questions and Developers Answers