The Developers Fail To Listen...Again.
Дата: 04.10.2011 17:56:21

And to hold dirt you need to win tournaments. That means winning a game of skill. Why would making the game reward those with more top tanks promote equal fights? It doesn't, its yet another barrier to casuals competing on equal terms.
UC NEEDS lower tier limits on cheap property. None of this locking crap that is a waste of resources that makes the game worse.
Vallter: Who said, that if team wins, their tanks will be locked for more or
less than 24 hours? And also with the nest update a defending clan
has to fight only with the winner of the attacking tournament. So
it's 1 fight each 24 ours at hardest times to hold the territory.
Meanwhile, if they succeed, all attackers will lose their tanks for
longer period of time. That means, that waves of attacks will
eventually stop, of the big clans don't want to lose the other side
of their territories.

The lockout will have no net effect on the competitiveness of small clans vs large clans. They can't compete now, nor will they be able to after this change is implemented. The only thing that will help small clans get onto the Global Map is the addition of new territories. If you want to be constructive, lobby WG for the expanded Global Map. Even if the full NA map isn't ready yet, they could at least give you all of Saharan Africa, the Middle East and/or Russia beyond the Urals to the Pacific (what we have on the RU server).
And just who are they failing to listen to? A small select group? Out of the hundreds of thousands of active players, I'm just not seeing the level of rage regarding this feature that you seem to attribute to it.
Vallter: The Global Map will be expanded in the Q1 or Q2 of 2012. Probably,
we will add Pacific region earlier.

Vallter: The time will show.
Also, I've seen the discussion regarding big organized clans and small clans, based on friendship. In any system, big, organized and professional force will be more successful in warfare, than a group of friends. Thousands of years of human evolution has proven it. And any system we implement won't change the alignment of forces. Big tanks will always conquer big territories. But still, we try to give small clans a possibility to hold their piece of land
Also, I've seen the discussion regarding big organized clans and small clans, based on friendship. In any system, big, organized and professional force will be more successful in warfare, than a group of friends. Thousands of years of human evolution has proven it. And any system we implement won't change the alignment of forces. Big tanks will always conquer big territories. But still, we try to give small clans a possibility to hold their piece of land
