Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Please dont by AC 1 Sentinel

Дата: 24.03.2016 08:44:28
View PostKnumb_Knutz, on Mar 23 2016 - 16:42, said:   Australia did the best they could with what they had.  the Brits and Americans had to defend themselves first and foremost early in the war.  In real life, this tank was not that bad.  It was comparable to the M3 Lee (which it was based on).  By the time it started rolling off the production line, the US Manufacturing has already outpaced the Australians and they had the much better M4 Sherman that they were giving to the Australians at that time.   None the less, it made for a great "Training" tank.

The_Chieftain:   It was not based on M3, and was not comparable. The 2pr just wasn't going to cut it in 1942, for either anti-armor or anti-infantry work. The upgunned variants had their own problems.

Реклама | Adv