Grenadiers Tank Destroyers
Дата: 28.01.2015 22:13:47
The_Chieftain: VI. IN ATTACK 8. In any tank attack the enemy antitank offense must
be neutralized. To accomplishthis the elements of the antitank
defense will be subjected to attacks from
enemy tanks, the air, and motorized or foot infantry. To
meet these attacks the grenadier battalion must be taught to attack
aggressively at every opportunity. VII. IN DEFENSE 9. In the
defense the grenadier tank destroyer battalion is trained to deploy
across the axis of approach of the hostile tank attack and wait in
ambush. As the hostile tanks approaches within range they will be
attacked and destroyed. Use of concealment and cover is essential.
10. The battalion likewise is trained to cut its way out of an
encirclement should it be completely surrounded by enemy forces.
VIII. PURSUIT 11. In pursuit the grenadier battalion has a
very limited field of action and should not be used in operations
of this kind. IX. WITHDRAWALS 12. In withdrawals the
grenadier battalion will be charged with stopping the forward
advance of hostile tanks and light mechanized forces. X.
SPECIAL OPERATIONS 13. In special operations the grenadier
battalion has its greatest scope of action, such as jungle warfare,
night operations, street fighting, combat in woods, as an advance
element in a river crossing and for penetrating terrain which is
inaccessible to the heavy tank destroyer units. XI. RADIO
COMMUNICATIONS 14. Radio communications are maintained by the
battalion with higher echelons by means of one SCR-506 radio within
the battalion headquarters. The battalion maintains contact with
the companies by the use of SCR-508 radio. Companies maintain
contact with the platoon through the SCR-510 radio. The attached
medical detachment of the battalion is equipped with the SCR-510 as
is the transportation platoon of the battalion headquarters and
headquarters company. The commanding officer of the battalion
headquarters company has available another SCR 506 radio for
communication throughout the battalion and with attached aerial
observation. This requires a total of four SCR-506 radios, one
SCR-508, and thirteen SCR-510 radio sets for the battalion.
PROVISIONAL TANK DESTROYER BATTALION (Grenadier)
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
OF PROPOSED ORGANIZATION ADVANTAGES: 1.
Simplicity of organization. 2. Minimum
of training time and' simplified training.
3. More adaptable for surprise operations than any
other ground organization. 4. Tonnage of rolling equipment for
overseas shipment is only 98 tons as compared with 1150 tons
in the heavy tank destroyer battalion. 5. Tremendous
fire power. As well as close range grenade
fire power there is medium range .50
cal. MG and . 30 cal. rifle fire 6. Ample
antiaircraft fire within the battalions, for defense against
low-flying airoraft. All weapons have a dual mission
andgunners are trained to .fire on aerial as well
as ground targets. Ground targets are primary. 7. Ease
and rapidity with which this battalion can disperse
or·concentrate. 8. Ease and rapidity with which it can effect
concealment or move to available cover. 9. Ease
and rapidity of deployment. Each fire unit (killer car)
is trained to act independently as well as collectively. 10. Small
initial cost of equipment. 11. Simplified supply and field
maintenance. 12. All equipment in the battalion is now in mass
production. 13. Activation of new units rapid and simple.
14. Minimum of technical training required. All men coming
from replacement-training centers will have received the
requisite technical training . 15. The equipment of this
organization is standard in other organizations, therefore its
transfer or conversion to other units or vice versa is simple.
16. It occupies a small bivouac area. Each vehicle and its crew is
independent for tactical operations, defense against aircraft, and
in messing, and therefore is in readiness to move from
bivouac to combatin a minimum of time. 17. The organization and
equipment as well as the primary and secondary weapons
are preminently suited for jungle warfare, street
fighting, and for clearing wooded areas of hostile tanks or other
mechanized units. 18. No rail shipment for long overland
travel required. 19. It provides the best single means of hunting,
finding and destroying tanks. 20. When deployed it presents a very
small and unprofitable target from the air. 21. Great
mobility and speed over roads and across country. 22. It utilizes a
minimum amount of rubber, rubber being a critical item in the
organization of new units. 23. Local .Protection is inherent
in the organization and weapons. 24. It has a wide and varied scope
of action for reconnaissance missions. 25. Suited for surprise
night operations where speed and comparative silence of
running vehicles are essential. 26. The weight of one
machine gun grenade is· 2 ¾ pounds as compared with 37
pounds for the 3” gun. DISADVANTAGES: 1. It
lacks long range fire power. 2. Like all
other organizations it is vulnerable to infantry attacks.
3. Its scope of action in desert
or prairie warfare is limited
Now, we may laugh a little bit now at the concept of
dealing with German tanks with a swarm of jeep-mounted troops armed
with AT rifle grenades, but in fairness to the man, the idea was
not entirely without merit, especially in restricted terrain. On
the other hand, we're still talking about some 300 men, one and a
half rifle companies, whose job is not to take and hold ground. It
seems highly likely that if such an organisation were actually to
be fielded, that they would immediately be given cavalry jobs, not
tank destroyer jobs. And one probably would also get involved in
internecine politics about if they truly are TD soldiers or
Infantry soldiers. (Bear in mind, the Colonel writing this up was
an infantryman). Further, an infantry company can probably do as
good a job: The grenadier TD battalion would almost certainly
require the use of covering infantry given the ranges they'd be
operating at, and if you havd infantry that close, why not use
their own AT rifles to take care of the tanks anyway? There were a
number of attemps made to create Tank Destroyer vehicles based
around the Willys 4x4 and 6x6 vehicles mounting the 37mm gun, which
one can argue is no better and no worse than lads armed with rifle
grenades. It depended very much on range and individual grenadier
accuracy. The 4x4 shown below is the 37mm GMC T2 (Modified), the
6x6 the 37mm GMC T14.
In the end, of course, the 37mm GMC T21 based on the
tougher Dodge chassis was selected for the role, entering service
as the 37mm GMC M6. Only to be promptly discarded as useless as the
armor and armament of tanks started racing upwards. No indication
is found in the archives as to how much approval LTC Negrotto's
proposal received. As ever, my Facebook page remains here,
my Youtube channel here,
and Twitch stream (Every Tuesday, and occasional evenings)
is here.
PROVISIONAL TANK DESTROYER BATTALION (Grenadier)
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
OF PROPOSED ORGANIZATION ADVANTAGES: 1.
Simplicity of organization. 2. Minimum
of training time and' simplified training.
3. More adaptable for surprise operations than any
other ground organization. 4. Tonnage of rolling equipment for
overseas shipment is only 98 tons as compared with 1150 tons
in the heavy tank destroyer battalion. 5. Tremendous
fire power. As well as close range grenade
fire power there is medium range .50
cal. MG and . 30 cal. rifle fire 6. Ample
antiaircraft fire within the battalions, for defense against
low-flying airoraft. All weapons have a dual mission
andgunners are trained to .fire on aerial as well
as ground targets. Ground targets are primary. 7. Ease
and rapidity with which this battalion can disperse
or·concentrate. 8. Ease and rapidity with which it can effect
concealment or move to available cover. 9. Ease
and rapidity of deployment. Each fire unit (killer car)
is trained to act independently as well as collectively. 10. Small
initial cost of equipment. 11. Simplified supply and field
maintenance. 12. All equipment in the battalion is now in mass
production. 13. Activation of new units rapid and simple.
14. Minimum of technical training required. All men coming
from replacement-training centers will have received the
requisite technical training . 15. The equipment of this
organization is standard in other organizations, therefore its
transfer or conversion to other units or vice versa is simple.
16. It occupies a small bivouac area. Each vehicle and its crew is
independent for tactical operations, defense against aircraft, and
in messing, and therefore is in readiness to move from
bivouac to combatin a minimum of time. 17. The organization and
equipment as well as the primary and secondary weapons
are preminently suited for jungle warfare, street
fighting, and for clearing wooded areas of hostile tanks or other
mechanized units. 18. No rail shipment for long overland
travel required. 19. It provides the best single means of hunting,
finding and destroying tanks. 20. When deployed it presents a very
small and unprofitable target from the air. 21. Great
mobility and speed over roads and across country. 22. It utilizes a
minimum amount of rubber, rubber being a critical item in the
organization of new units. 23. Local .Protection is inherent
in the organization and weapons. 24. It has a wide and varied scope
of action for reconnaissance missions. 25. Suited for surprise
night operations where speed and comparative silence of
running vehicles are essential. 26. The weight of one
machine gun grenade is· 2 ¾ pounds as compared with 37
pounds for the 3” gun. DISADVANTAGES: 1. It
lacks long range fire power. 2. Like all
other organizations it is vulnerable to infantry attacks.
3. Its scope of action in desert
or prairie warfare is limited
Now, we may laugh a little bit now at the concept of
dealing with German tanks with a swarm of jeep-mounted troops armed
with AT rifle grenades, but in fairness to the man, the idea was
not entirely without merit, especially in restricted terrain. On
the other hand, we're still talking about some 300 men, one and a
half rifle companies, whose job is not to take and hold ground. It
seems highly likely that if such an organisation were actually to
be fielded, that they would immediately be given cavalry jobs, not
tank destroyer jobs. And one probably would also get involved in
internecine politics about if they truly are TD soldiers or
Infantry soldiers. (Bear in mind, the Colonel writing this up was
an infantryman). Further, an infantry company can probably do as
good a job: The grenadier TD battalion would almost certainly
require the use of covering infantry given the ranges they'd be
operating at, and if you havd infantry that close, why not use
their own AT rifles to take care of the tanks anyway? There were a
number of attemps made to create Tank Destroyer vehicles based
around the Willys 4x4 and 6x6 vehicles mounting the 37mm gun, which
one can argue is no better and no worse than lads armed with rifle
grenades. It depended very much on range and individual grenadier
accuracy. The 4x4 shown below is the 37mm GMC T2 (Modified), the
6x6 the 37mm GMC T14.
In the end, of course, the 37mm GMC T21 based on the
tougher Dodge chassis was selected for the role, entering service
as the 37mm GMC M6. Only to be promptly discarded as useless as the
armor and armament of tanks started racing upwards. No indication
is found in the archives as to how much approval LTC Negrotto's
proposal received. As ever, my Facebook page remains here,
my Youtube channel here,
and Twitch stream (Every Tuesday, and occasional evenings)
is here.Grenadiers Tank Destroyers














