Has Campaign 2 and Sandbox mode shown need for more land?

Yankee, on Dec 05 2013 - 15:53, said: I don't think Canada is going to remain Tier 8 once we are down to the single Global map.
Hyp/Q confirm?


turtle722, on Dec 05 2013 - 17:34, said: I am glad you all are looking at it and are paying attention.  As pointed out it is a tough balancing act.  My point of view is I have been playing for almost 3 years now.   Clan Wars is the only thing that really keeps me interested long term.  I am not a tourney player, so CW is it for me. What other end game is there?  Going down each additional new tank line is getting less and less exciting.
The question becomes one of human nature. With the LZs everyone can participate in CW.  Is winning a few LZ tourney battles, but not taking land enough reward for people to keep plugging away?  Do people need to win land, hold land, get a little gold to feel rewarded enough to keep playing?
IMO, Wargaming should look to increase end game content as much as possible, but it doesn't have to be all gold driven.  Have 3 iterations of the CW map, any given clan can only be active on a single map.
Minor league Clan wars - Have a tier 6 and Tier 8 section of the map, rewards are credits only.
Major League Clan wars - have a tier 8 and Tier 10 section of the map, rewards are Africa like, or 20-30% of the gold payouts of the map today.
Elite League Clan wars - Tier 10 only, map payouts are what we have today
If you look at World of Warcraft, they did as much as possible to make end game content open to everyone.  Every game has the hard core vs casual argument, even this one.  Set up content that appeals to each one.  What might even be cooler is to make clans have to "qualify" for the Elite league.  Run 3 month seasons (not campaigns).  The top 80% gold earners get to stay on the elite map, bottom 20% have to go to Major league.  For the Major leagues top 20% can go to Elite league....