Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Panther II

Дата: 26.12.2010 16:25:07
View PostHoukka, on 26 December 2010 - 01:05 PM, said: This is a beta. Nothing needs to be "accepted as such" in a beta. If you ask me, even when a game is finished, the players have a right to point out what they think is wrong with the game and even not accept it as such.
Also, it's a very bad justification for imbalance in a game that it's "a game design decision". It's true, making a game imbalanced is a game design decision, but its not a very good one, is it?
P.S. I'm only as far as tier 5, but the stats for those two tanks seem to confirm that the T-54 is not only cheaper, but better in every aspect than the Panther II. Except you get a better gun once you've played a cardboard box armed with a peashooter for long enough. Then you get a cardboard box armed with an 88mm or a 105mm tank gun.
I liked your post up to that point, but I don't think imbalance can be justified with any excuse that'll leave the players happy.

Overlord: Even after the game is released, there will be changes and adjustments of vehicle specs. Rebalancing goes non-stop. "One game design decision" can be substituted for another.
Especially this applies to newly added tanks, since they have been balanced rougly before roll-out.

Реклама | Adv