Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

New Wargaming Rules violation Policy

Дата: 02.08.2016 04:04:14
View PostLostThatLovinFeeling, on Aug 01 2016 - 15:02, said:   You think they will look at every complaint? I do not. I think it is a simi-automated system with final bans being looked at only.  

NyxWGA: It is not automated in any way. No strikes will be handed out based on automation.

View Postpetersway, on Aug 01 2016 - 15:03, said: I am very worried about this policy, what about false complaints? even friends in the same game can gang up on an innocent and make him(her) look bad.This should be reconsidered

NyxWGA: All complaint will be investigated. If you did nothing wrong, then there will be no strike, regardless of how many people report it.

View PostTolos, on Aug 01 2016 - 15:04, said:   Sweet if i get a perma ban i can just make a forum alt...so if that's the case...why bother at all ?.

NyxWGA: If I had determined it was alt of a formerly perma banned account, then I would have taken action. The issue has been resolved to my satisfaction, meaning you are making incorrect assumptions about the account.

View PostThe_Fabulous_Mr_Mocoman, on Aug 01 2016 - 15:08, said:   False complaints? When some one ask me how I like my coffee, and my response is like my coffee like my men, black a permaban offense? Because according to the mods, that was overly sexual, and worth a 1 day ban, and 5 of those are worth a permabanned offense. That seems to me is a mod who has other issues, other then a silly joke about coffee, and I don't want to be permanned from the forums, because I like to make a silly joke once and awhile and that a mod thinks liking black men is a bannable offense.

NyxWGA: You left off the last part of the sentence, the part that made it overly sexual. I have deliberately not quoted it in its entirety either, because it's inappropriate. I don't want you to quote it exactly either, but it was overly sexual and was treated as such.

View PostBoilerBandsman, on Aug 01 2016 - 15:14, said:   So completely inappropriate that no one in the thread commented on them, or knew why he was banned.    "Transparency."

NyxWGA: Multiple players did think they were inappropriate, even for CR/D, and reported the posts. Having the post reported is what triggers us to go and look at it in the first place, but we still then make a determination of whether it was actually inappropriate or not. I reviewed that ban before it was placed, and agreed with the determination.

View Postheavywx, on Aug 01 2016 - 16:07, said:   I'm sorry but if your butt is under 18 years old you shouldn't be playing world of tanks anyway. It's a violent game that is not suitable for anyone under the age of 18. If a Kid is playing this and sees a 4 letter word then that falls on the parents for allowing their kids to play such a violent game Period. And you are correct there to a point. WG is a cooperation not an individual see the difference. And the US constitution Is the highest law in the land, which WG NA has to abide by, which gives me the RIGHT (you know those things that can't be taken away from you) to say what's on my mind as long as its not a plausible threat. That includes a kid hearing or seeing it sorry. SO take your PC crap somewhere else

NyxWGA: Our game is rated T for Teen, and is supposed to be suitable for ages 13 and up. You are incorrect that you have a right to say whatever you want. We have the right to keep our games and websites friendly for players 13 and up. We as a business are not allowed to censor people based on things like race, religion, age, sexual orientation, the standard list of things you aren't allowed to discriminate against. We can however censor folks who harass, bully, use hate speech, use profanity, etc.

View PostWOT_Smartguy, on Aug 01 2016 - 16:08, said:   SO to clarify, automatated TK bans will still roll off and not be counted against you under the new system?

NyxWGA: Correct

View PostJTM78, on Aug 01 2016 - 16:22, said: 1. How are rule offending player notified that they get strike or warning? Through email for in-game, through forum PM for forums
2. Some players have been here for 5 years and a strike a year would not think be hard to get. I don't like the permanent ban idea with no roll off for small things. If it's inconsequential and truly "small" it shouldn't be a strike. Perma bans cannot be placed by everyone on staff - they must be reviewed by a team lead. If the lead saw that any of the strikes had been incorrectly placed, the perma would not be issued.
3. Do multiple report for the same issue in the same match count as multiple strikes? No
4. Since the TK/ team system is staying the same, can tk or team damage get you strikes? Not TK that is punished by the system. We do still review complaints of physics abuse that the system doesn't always correctly categorize (barrel in barrel is one of those) If it is something that is reviewed by staff, and hand placed, then it is a strike.
5. Will support be on line 24/7 to help with banned or strike for offending players? Support is already available 24/7, 7 days a week. Our turnaround for tickets last week was between 3-10 hours. 3 hours for easy stuff like a tank restorations, longer for things like refunds that require we check with the payment aggregator. Three different games for WG patched last week and standard tickets with questions about patches has caused turnaround time to increase, but that is normal the week after a patch.

I understand as a on again off again player that something most be do with/about toxic players and I would like to see them gone but this maybe to broad of a fix.

NyxWGA:  

View PostTickle_Monster, on Aug 01 2016 - 16:38, said: I'm sorry, does your title not say "Player Experience Specialist Supervisor"?   Do you know what the "player experience" covers?  It covers a "player's experieince".  That means pub matches, tournys, clan wars, RAMPAGE MODE, etc.  That means rules violations for rigging public matches is within your area.   Answer the question on T-22s.  Why were players allowed to rig matches to get them, banned, most likely by the "player experience" group, but allowed to keep them.   Prove to the community, right here, right now, you're worth a salt of your word you want us to take you on right now.

NyxWGA: If I had an answer I would give it to you. I was not involved in any of the discussions about rigging. I do know that much of what was decided was decided at a global level. I am not pretending that nothing happened there, or that we had the absolute perfect response to it. There were many different responses, and all of them had downsides, so it was about trying to choose the best solution when all of the solutions were flawed in some way. But its totally outside the scope of this conversation - this conversation is about players receiving strikes for misbehavior, not about why we didn't take tanks away. The part of that situation that is relevant to this conversation would be the part where they got banned, which would have counted as a strike.

Реклама | Adv