New Wargaming Rules violation Policy
Дата: 02.08.2016 00:48:12
The_Fabulous_Mr_Mocoman, on Aug 01 2016 - 14:25, said: Then for transparency, tell us, Why was hulk banned for, he
was a funny poster in crd. Why do you reward cheaters with T22s,
and why are you guys hell bent on killing the end game, and why is
enjoying my coffee like I like my men, black in a dead thread
months after I posted it worthy of a forum ban, which would now be
one of my 5 strikes, and tell us about the details of the on going
lawsuit, and about how your own staff tried to rig the 4th
campaign. I would like some transparency please.NyxWGA: The only thing I will say about hulk was that yes, there was
an unaltered image of a clan wars map. Below it were two other
images that were completely inappropriate. People are not
perma banned for one post, so it is incorrect to say anyone was
banned based on just one post. People who are perma banned get
there by being inappropriate over and over and over again. Some
players have over a 100 forum points over the lifetime of their
forum account. Those players shouldn't have the ability to come
back literally over a hundred times doing the same thing, and
ruining everyone else's experience. Your sanction was for a
comment that was sexual in nature. I won't quote it exactly because
it's inappropriate, and was correctly removed from the forum. If
you get a strike after the policy is in effect that you disagree
with - it wasn't that bad, it was too old to sanction, whatever it
is that you disagree with - then please send an appeal, so that we
can review it. Strikes can always be removed if they were placed
incorrectly. I have no insights into clan wars, rigging, or
lawsuits. These are handled by another department. I am happy to be
transparent about things I do have insight into, however.
New Wargaming Rules violation Policy














