A review of Wargaming.
Дата: 15.11.2012 00:09:07
jasonvoorheesrevenge, on Nov 14 2012 - 03:42, said: Well I disagree about the forum moderation. I see too many rule
breaking...I dont know if its because some of your moderators are
playing favoritesMugsy_: If you see something please be sure to report it. The GMs
definitely don't play favorites. Each person is processed through
the same system, even I cannot accelerate an offender being
permabanned.
Solono, on Nov 14 2012 - 20:01, said: Funny that, all the evidence me and my associates have posted about
it gets deleted under the convenient "Discussing Mod/GM decisions"
rule. The WG vicious circle: They want feedback/evidence of
abuse/corruption, evidence/feedback is given at great length, it
gets removed and offending poster is punished, they want
feedback/evidence...Mugsy_: If you disagree with GM sanctions I would suggest you contact
Jewel_Thief. If you have some instance of abuse you feel you cannot
go to JT about please message me directly any time. But our policy
is not to discuss sanctions or individual account details
publicly.
Hugh979, on Nov 14 2012 - 07:39, said: The real problem is the "set rules" don't apply equally to
everyone...they have a terrible tendency to discipline the
retaliatory poster instead of the one who originally started
hurling insults. It is difficult though not to come to the eventual
conclusion that their consistent oversight is intentional and
geared toward censoring those who aren't on the cheer leading
squad. A corrupt system is a corrupt system and their is no merit
in placidly accepting arbitrary punishment like a sheep.Mugsy_: The rules are enforced against anyone who breaks any rule at any
time. The GMs cannot concern themselves with who started what and
who escalated the conflict and why. Retaliations are persecuted
just the same as instigation.
In regards to censorship, I think it is very difficult to communicate frustrations and negative feelings in a constructive way. It's kind of an advanced communication skill. So even when valuable negative feedback is put on the table, if it is packaged in profanity and rage it has to get swept off. I have made it my goal to try to find those rage posters and talk to them one on one, in hopes of sifting through their emotional outbursts to find what it is exactly we can do to improve their experience with our game and their behavior in our community. Some times this blows up in my face and I realize there isn't anything we can do to appease this person - but far more often I feel I make headway.
In regards to censorship, I think it is very difficult to communicate frustrations and negative feelings in a constructive way. It's kind of an advanced communication skill. So even when valuable negative feedback is put on the table, if it is packaged in profanity and rage it has to get swept off. I have made it my goal to try to find those rage posters and talk to them one on one, in hopes of sifting through their emotional outbursts to find what it is exactly we can do to improve their experience with our game and their behavior in our community. Some times this blows up in my face and I realize there isn't anything we can do to appease this person - but far more often I feel I make headway.
eggplant84, on Nov 14 2012 - 15:10, said: I hate Mugsy...not for any particular reason...just wanna blow up
his tank. I hate cats...brown sweaters, stale cigarettes, corn
tortillas, and my ex-wife. Whew...feel better.P.S. Drown yer tank Mugsy!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mugsy_: Well you aren't invited to my birthday party. And eggplants taste
like dirt.
A review of Wargaming.