US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements
Дата: 23.12.2010 06:05:50
jcqc96, on 23 December 2010 - 05:21 AM, said: Actually the T26E5 design was made due to the fact that the Sherman
Jumbo design was highly successful in the field. So technically, it
can be called the "Pershing Jumbo".MrVic: Thats a bit off 
Due to the testing and performance
of the Pershing, and realizing it was in fact a medium by current
standards not a heavy. The Ordnance board moved to improve the
Pershing and attempt to create a better heavy tank. This project
was launched and two separate projects were launched to achieve
this. One was the T32 the other was the T26E5. The Jumbo was
considered a failure until in field until in theater commanders
reported it was a great lead tank since it could survive the first
ambush hit
Due to the testing and performance
of the Pershing, and realizing it was in fact a medium by current
standards not a heavy. The Ordnance board moved to improve the
Pershing and attempt to create a better heavy tank. This project
was launched and two separate projects were launched to achieve
this. One was the T32 the other was the T26E5. The Jumbo was
considered a failure until in field until in theater commanders
reported it was a great lead tank since it could survive the first
ambush hit 
Archives\Beta\Suggestions\US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements