Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Why on Track to Dirty Arty

Дата: 12.04.2015 21:29:20
View PostKramburglar, on Apr 12 2015 - 18:16, said: When was arty voted on?  I don't remember seeing anything like that I won't pretend to know if player feedback factors into changes WG makes.  My point was simply to counter the "WG makes lots of money so they're automatically right" Like Serb saying 83% of players own end tier arty despite the fact that it's extremely unlikely that 83% of players even own an end tier tank of any kind (there are huge amounts of players that never even get over 1000 battles)   The way WG presents their "data" is often highly suspect.  Serb has been caught in lies before and simply says his credibility doesn't matter since he's in charge

Lert:   "Should arty be removed" polls were so common at one point that WG started closing them and redirecting people to the official arty thread. In the vast majority of cases, the forum base voted overwhelmingly for arty to not be removed. If this isn't good enough for you, feel free to make your own poll and see for yourself.  

View PostMyHonourIsTruth, on Apr 12 2015 - 18:17, said:   The key to this entire quote is "competitors".     They can do better and will be forced to.  

Lert:   At first there were no competitors. It was claimed by many that WoT wouldn't last and was destroying itself with the way it treated arty. Didn't happen. Then MWO came. That was said to drive a lot of people away from WoT and force WG to rethink what they're doing. Didn't happen. Then 'Blorg Plunder' ground forces came around. That was surely going to kill WoT right then and there and force WG to rethink what they were doing. Didn't happen. Now 'Advanced Warbling' is on the doorstep. Surely that will kill WoT and force Wg to rethink what they're doing. Right?   .... Yeah, about that. I'll see it when it happens.   "But Advanced Warbling is different! It'll succeed where those others failed because of - "   Yeah yeah yeah. Promises promises. I'll see it when it happens.   The 'doom of WoT' has been predicted almost as many times as the end of the world. Guess what? They're still both here.   Is WoT perfect? No. Can it be improved? Probably. Do I presume to know better than WG how to make a multi million dollar, multi-national online franchise? No. I'm simply a gamer who plays what I enjoy. The moment I stop enjoying WoT I will stop playing WoT. And I will do so without announcements on the forum, passive aggressiveness about the 'suckitude of WG and WoT' and how much better the competition is.  

Реклама | Adv