I can't believe I'm saying this but... thank you Wargaming

theSparatan117, on Aug 26 2018 - 18:14, said: I just bought the Mutz the other day because I was looking for an additional T8 tank to play with. I like the flow and progression of tanks at T8 and it really shows off the best fundamentals of the game. I had watched other people play with the Mutz in times past and thought "wow, that tank is annoying" without giving it much thought to being "OP" or something of the nature.    However, since I've been playing it (since I bought it) I have been enjoying playing world of tanks again.... which is a foreign concept to me (why do I play this game again if I didn't enjoy it?) ... but in all seriousness... it's literally everything I like about this game while having the perks to enable me to ignore the things I hate about it. Things like: Bad economy above Tier 7, Matchmaking, cost of ammunition, cost of repairs, cost of consumables.... even when I get a loss in the tank and lose and do almost no damage, I still come out with positive credits. That makes me want to play all the more with this thing.    I've actually fared pretty well with the tank so far, averaging around 800 damage per game, which is not a small number given that the alpha of this tank hovers right around 230. It's fast, it's nimble, and it comes with camo already built into the hull. The gun depression is insane, and the rate of fire isn't bad either.    If I had to ask Wargaming to look into buffing anything about it to give it a sweet spot, I'd recommend taking a second off of it's reload time (6.6 seconds down to 5.6 seconds) and decreasing it's dispersion from 0.33 to 0.32 or even 0.31. Since that's heavily RNG based, I'd leave it up to the developer to tinker with. There is definitely a notable difference between 0.33 and 0.32 but it doesn't feel like the "sweet spot".    Anyways, thanks WG... I'll look forward to seeing more of you guys on the battlefield.