Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

November 2011 Oceanic Challenge

Дата: 24.11.2011 21:32:45
View PostRanma, on Nov 24 2011 - 09:07, said: Ok.
I and my colleagues may join the Korean office later cuz had lot of business contact with Wargaming.net CEO, COO and lot of managers in Korea. At that time, the Oceanic tourney will be moved to Asian cluster and someone in the office would manage the system.
There are numorous tourneys and professional leagues in Korea, and nobody sets up the rule like this. There are no 3 game winners, so superior 2 teams are dismissed from tourney. Do you think this is reasonable? 2 qualified teams just lost their chance for higher ground cuz they did not make 3 wins. I read the announcement about E-sports managers wanted in news section, and really want to ask about E-sports system management.
I even can't find where is the rule book & no announcement about the rule b4 tourney started. You just hide everything from participants and now claim everything is OK.
To make things reasonble, it would be better to ignore 3 win rules or make rematch for 2 teams. If they fail to get 3 wins again, just promote most won team to higher ground.
I really want to know about what are you thinking about.

GeneralDirection: This has been a standard rule for World of Tanks tournaments for quite a while now. Draws resulted in disqualification for both teams.
However, I'm not a fan of that and will be changing it in future tournaments. This tournament is a good example of why I'm not a fan of the rule.

Реклама | Adv