Was the Centurion AX Always Terrible
Дата: 28.01.2022 03:35:54
Belicia, on Jan 27 2022 - 07:22, said: The weird thing is, on paper, the M48 and CAX are VERY similar -
identical penetration, alpha, armor. Their differences are
pretty minor and dependent on play-style - CAX has 1 degree more
gun depression, the M48 has 10m more view range, the CAX is 8 km/hr
faster, the M48 has a better power/weight ratio. Sure, the
M48 probably has marginally superior stats from the perspective of
a unicum player, but it's really not enough to justify dumping on
the CAX like it's a turd while simultaneously praising the M48Draschel: Not a whole lot of people praise the M48A Patton as being an
effective, competitive, stellar tier ten tank. While people will
definitely admit it is pleasant to play in pub battle, its simply
not up to snuff for most forms of competition. CW, no. Ranked, no.
Sure it works in qualifier and 3rd division, but not after. But
anyway tier X works in qualifiers. M48 trades camo,
HESH, mobility, gun depression for slightly more DPM,
view range, overall armored protection....but importantly massively
better gun handling. While people may argue 0.32 centurion base
accuracy means something, Patton is more often ready to fire first
because of better aim-time and dispersion control. They are
similar and take similar battlefield roles. Simply put
in gun depression roles and wars, STB1 is superior. It is faster,
has more turret armor, more DPM, more camo. And truth be told M48A
patton and centurion are too chunky that Chieftain takes their role
anyway, with it being not a whole lot slower.
Was the Centurion AX Always Terrible