Warp103 ♦ Skoda T56 ♦ Good but no defender,BBQ ♦ Emil 1951 is better and freeish

Draschel: Lets look at this through building blocks. Basic materials. What makes a strong tank. A burst fire heavy tank in this example. A ridge, support burst fire heavy tank.So automatically, we rule out IS3A, 703ii, IS2ii because these are breakthrough, non gun depression burst fire tanks.We will leave out 50-100, because that is basically a FCM50 with an autoloader, its a med.That leaves us Emil 1951, Somua, Skoda 56, Bisonte, T77.                 First category, gun handling.                 Every tank here sort of has bad gun handling. Like, there are no progetto in the bunch. T77 has the best overall accuracy if it can patiently aim its shots. Somua and Skoda have the most controllable dispersions.                 Second category, miscellaneous firepower.                All tanks have good gun dep, but bisonte and Emil have the most. Skoda has the strongest Alpha, and even has good DPM with it. Somua unloads very fast and has large burst damage capacity, good DPM. Bisonte and T77                       have outrageous pen values. Emil 1951 is pretty bad.                Third category, mobility                obviously Emil and T77 have near unmatchable mobility among the group.                 Fourth category, armor               These tanks do not have very good armor profiles for heavies. None of these tanks are in their element of armor usage, except when hull down. And this makes sense. A burst fire heavy shouldn't be popular for armor right?                 Fifth category, miscellaneous                Skoda has the most HP. Bisonte has the most view range.  I hate using Skoda 56 because its arguably the strongest tier 8 heavy. But these tanks have the same role, meaning they need to be compared. If Skoda didn't exist, lets go back in time a year. Somua is still better than Bisonte anyway