burass reclass, and move to tier 9
Дата: 23.12.2021 03:51:58

Draschel: But it is their business? It took them a while to figure
things out, but they can make profits - selling Skorp G and SU130PM
- as opposed to selling IS6 and 112? You know this. What do I
think? Well sure, I think initial premium tanks are better. Even
current buffs to premium tanks are acceptable. But they want to
sell. How can you blame them, the game has been going for over a
decade.By the way, though not renegade, M IV Y is
considerably -not- balanced according to historic Wargaming premium
tank creation. M IV Y may have avg DPM and view range,
but its new mechanic is worth something. A good armor
profile, it is CONSIDERABLY mobile compared to mobile tanks
already, like Renegade, E75TS, Emil1951. Its more like AMX50100,
with a tonne more armor. This isn't balance.

Draschel: We have T23E3 and T26 Eagle.I would be better off with World
of Tanks appropriately balancing tanks with buffs, not in their
*nationalistic biased* way.When we look at the buffs to tanks like
(T92 light tank, T95E2 medium) ......then look at 59-patton,
ISU130, KV4 kresl.....its a complete joke. T25 Pilot can get
something like 8.00 RoF. 102mm hull like Pershing, 114mm front
turret. Importantly 600 horsepower engine like T37. Do you know
Pershing stock engine more powerful than T25 Pilot? How does T37
fit that engine while they don't fit it into Pilot. These kind of
changes, make sense and are worthwhile to turn the tank into
something capable, not a turd. M48 Rhz still hasn't been
looked at. T95E2 got .03 aim-time, 9 penetration. Is this so kind
of joke? Or T92 only getting penetration? 59-Patton is the same
basic tank as T95E2, and has whoppingly already been buffed 4
times.
burass reclass, and move to tier 9