Дата: 22.12.2021 01:18:35
Angry_Johnny_Killbillys, on Dec 21 2021 - 21:01, said: What has always interested me about these threads is basically what
Saffron said: " focus on intent rather than the mechanic. Intent
rarely changes." In virtually every other aspect of WG as a
business is lambasted for 12 years as being inept, deceitful,
greedy and dishonest. YET MM is honest trustworthy aspect of their
business model and pure, simple and above all random. Even with
tier adjustments being stated in their patient to maintain interest
in the game so it doesn't become boring which means keep them
playing to spend money. The lengths that some go on their stat
sheets and collection of data to basically come up with the trend
which has nothing to do with intent. If WG has followed their
pattern of inept work which IMO they have why would not they have
screwed up the MM from the start? Based on "random" why is I
frequently see another E-25 in a match on the opposite team
virtually 86% of the time ( which I tracked for about a year
sometime ago). Is that random or can WG and does WG place certain
tanks opposite each other in MM? Is it that other E-25 player is in
need of a fun stimulus tier adjustment coincidentally at the same
time I am in the player pool or has WG programed in other
adjustments?
Draschel: But this does happen. Its happened for a decade. Do you not notice
even in your tier, PzK S35 and Pz38H commonly being weighted to low
number per match, and near always mirrored by an enemy one? It
happens on specified tanks. I don't know for sure if E25 is, but I
would learn towards it not being one from experience. I see more
matches with E25 only on one side, than I ever see matches without
Hotchkiss on both sides. And, funny you say no judgements, but
you judge moments before. Nice. So is that why you only create 23
battle accounts to post? Because prior to it, is an account
banned?