games 2 levels above you - not worth playing

Draschel:  The argument is biased my end, because I value performance, responsibility, consistency. And +2/-2 is a hiccup, actually politely -2 is the hiccup.  Yes, it is easy to achieve consistency when I am +2,  no doubt. But I have to try 5x more when I am bottom @-2. At any rate, because I ahve had over a decade experience with me and Tanks, yes is +2/-2 miles ahead of +4/-4? +5/-5 in an artillery, heavy, LT?  Sure is.  But since I have that experience, I know what should be culminate MM, as to what is truly fair, and that is +1/-1. Upon getting that, will there be others that say,  "Oh come on MM, just make it same tier games, make the game FAIR"  There sure will be, but it won't be me. It won't be others like me. I won't be big time streamers across EU, with their reputation out on what they say, with hundreds of thousands of subs watching daily,  complaining over newly +1/-1 I am a fair man though. I am willing to trade away, my -2,  so I don't have to see +2. I have  3-marks  on my IS6, 112, WZ111 so I'm not just going to play those relentlessly, and for me? To play the Tog? Ain't happening. Maybe panther M10, Suka pershing, FCM50.  But imagine if the remaining days I spent in pub battle left in WoT, must be comprised of FCM50, Panther M10, T14, Excelsior, 112, 111, IS6, suka pershing. And wait until BM or 30% off coupon to buy T-34-3, and start that. Pretty bland, you'd say?   No. They shouldn't. But they should make MM decisions on a fairer gaming experience. And that is what +1/-1 does.