Why did they "buff" the Tiger's gun?

Draschel: That's just obnoxious. You are the first player I've met who denounces the changes. And let me tell you the people I watch who love the changes are considerably more capable. I will let the DPM slide, because +5 DPM means nothing. But it is noteworthy to still state, no loss of DPM despite gaining alpha. In fact, you GAIN some.But 0.02 aim-time, 40 alpha, 3,000 extra potential damage does mean something. 7.69 fire rate will still perm-track things, and is only slower than IS running 100 or Carro running 88 - both of which you stunningly have +30 alpha and +175 DPMAll for 150 extra silver per shot, and a loss of 1.3rds/min. If you were -----ssssssoooooo---- concerned about rate of fire, contesting mediums, DPM, tracking...? why not use the L56  88? The argument doesn't make sense You are squabbling over nothing. Tiger II is the issue here. And VK4502A. Why didn't Tiger II get DPM like Caernarvon? 32 pdr way better than L71 88, and on a better platform. Tiger H has the DPM Tiger II does, where is the up-scale tiered effect? Why not even at least Caernarvon AX or STA1 DPM? Both those tanks have better mid-bore guns too