"Limit arty to only one per team"... "People play arty only for m...

Draschel:  You aren't required to watch popular streamers, no one forces you to. But you shouldn't be so insulting to those that do, which seem to be here in no short supply. Ignorance is bliss? You care to explain? Since you think you have all the answers. https://ibb.co/86hLYNz Don't worry, it isn't me. I'm not that, nor do I pretend to be, that good. In fact, you can see for yourself, he has led NA server in GW Panther last two months. Go checkCan you please explain to me, why his tanks, massively sport more contribution per game? Why is it, on average his artillery unit, is taking longer to 3 mark than tanks?Are you going to insult him too? In that he doesn't know how to play? Arguing over the internet is easy. Anyone can say anything. But fact is quite different from fiction You do not have a clue. And you can huff and puff and blow your ears out, it won't help your case. Artillery is very easy to play, hence the server population doing reasonably well in them, raising the average bar higher than expected for 3-mark requirements server-wide. But these SPGs, likewise are very difficult, extremely, to do exceptionally well in. To set yourself apart from the rest, and be above that top 95%, so you need more games. The decrease in reliability, requires more games. But if everyone is doing well, but  very very very very very few are doing excellent, the damage required still is lower than that of tanks. Whereas in tanks, many people do badly unlike arta, but likewise many others do great in, unlike arta, so it balances and actually exceeds what is seen in SPGs. I bet you never took a stats class, despite your name, ironic.  His play, is just steadily acquiring that high damage in tanks, very regularly, not really subject to reliability issues, because tanks are inherently more reliable.  This is where you struggle. And it isn't an insult, you just lack the fundamentals required to see it.