rigging of games,

Clutch_Shot_007, on Aug 29 2021 - 18:12, said:   I think it never ends because there's no way to really resolve the issue with high  confidence with the available information.   I'm agnostic on the issue, because without proof one way or the other, how can one be sure?  So, it's one of those "You just have to make up your own damn mind" kind of things.  But proof is a very high standard.  I mean, no one can prove that smoking causes cancer in humans because of the confounding possibility that people who are predisposed to getting cancer may be those who choose to smoke.  That's literally what stands in the way of proving it.  Well, actually, a double blind randomized control study of humans would resolve it, but that doesn't exist and will probably never happen.  That would be the gold standard of proof in that realm.  Yet, do you believe smoking causes cancer, even though not everybody who smokes gets lung cancer?  I do.  Seemingly the majority of people now believe it.  Most of the time we have to reach conclusions even if we don't have a rock solid proof.