Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?

DeviouslyCursed:  Apparently only a few actually read my long post. I will repost the pertinent portion here, since I already addressed this issue clearly.-----------------------------------------------------As far as Neato's comments. Well, which response has the correct answer to 2 + 2? A. The answer is 4B. The answer is 4, you prick. They both do. Adding an insult does not make the answer any less correct. It is still the right answer. The truth of Neato's answers does not change. The accuracy of his data does not change. Yes, I know; those of simple minds get triggered and can't separate out the facts from the jibes when there's been an insult. It's part of why they can't arrive at the correct conclusion anyway; they're easily distracted. But that's really not our problem. Yes, I also know about the whole "but you can convince people if you use nice words!" position some try to bring up. That might work when people are on the fence, or in a different medium. But on internet forums, I think I may have seen about 5 people be convinced after an argument since about the year 2000.  This isn't a courtroom, where "truth" is what you can convince people it is and a person's life is then affected. Your position about how people perceive things, and emotional arguments matter there. But we're talking about actual reality. Reality doesn't care if you believe it, it is still true. Reality doesn't care if you like it, it is still true. Reality doesn't care if someone insulted you and hurt your little feelings, it is still reality.---------------------------------------------------------