Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?

Дата: 19.07.2021 23:32:31
View Postda_Rock002, on Jul 19 2021 - 15:11, said:   What HoF are you talking about?    The one in the Service Record is damned easy to get into.   Do nothing but play the game and every vehicle you play is "in it".    Nobody has to be lucky to get in.   As for placing...  that happens without your doing anything too.      As for your being 82nd .....    post a screen shot or it isn't happening.       As for your shaming of SimplySimple in your post, it's amazing how seldom the forum rules are enforced.         show us a screen shot of your awesome HoF position or you're busted

DeviouslyCursed:  Look it up yourself, you lazy prick. It is now 96th place now over all, and 87 in tiers 8-10. It adjusts daily. And SimplySimple was the one that brought it up and bragged about it. (plus he's been calling everyone else stupid for about 40 pages now.) So you can take your little whine about him being called on it and stuff it. 

View PostSimplyPzB2, on Jul 19 2021 - 18:09, said:
You are a moron, got it.   Winning 15-20 out of 100 IS EFFECTIVELY losing all of them.  I'll say this again.  If I play 1,000 battles and only win 150-200 of them - I might as well have lost all of them.  As losing 750-800/1,000 is in no way shape or form any fun.  - How is winning one of these 'not a challenge'?  Because winning these really comes down to luck.  The way more skilled team has to seriouly fumble.

DeviouslyCursed:  And that is a stupid way of looking at it. This is why you under stand nothing. Number are meaningless to you when it suits you. You are a dishonest, immature person. You're also wrong. winning 150-200 is not losing them all. That's a moron's way of looking at it. So it doesn't surprise me that you take that position. As for it not being a challenge to win when you're out matched because "The way more skilled team has to seriouly fumble"... learn to strip the ball, p****. 

View PostSimplyPzB2, on Jul 19 2021 - 18:09, said: Month to month is meaninglesss.  When I talk about 'hall of fame', I look at the 'max/all time' rating.  The max rating is by date, number of battles, and win rate.  So go to the hall of fame.  Selecte the date of "Since 2014", select 4,000 battles (for individual players) - to get 'max/all time' rating.   Your win rate puts you in 29,000th+ place. 
  The 122 isn't listed, probably because it's a premium tank that doesn't have enough numbers?  (Most other premiums are listed).  But again, month to month is meaningless.  As some months some tanks aren't played that much.  For tanks, go to hall of fame, select "Since 2014", and select 500+ battles - this is 'max/all time' best of rating.  And is what I am talking about when I say 'hall of fame'.

DeviouslyCursed:  Agreed, month to month is useless. But so is selecting 500+. Who the hell plays tech tree tanks that much? This means you've taken most players out of the list. Had to get pretty specific to get yourself up there, didn't ya? You're not even top 100 when using the 150 selection.  

Реклама | Adv