Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Дата: 19.07.2021 00:24:08
SimplyPzB2, on Jul 18 2021 - 21:48, said: Point 2 stated that a good team does not always blow out a bad team. That's a fact. It's common for the bad team to have a couple of good players that prevent a full on blowout. Or it's also common for a bad team to camp hard, preventing a full on blowout, as digging them out takes time/hp/tanks - even with a good team. That you don't know this speaks to your limited knowledge of gameplay. - SBMM is not about blowouts - BUT IT'S NOT ABOUT WINRATE EITHER. Sbmm is about a "level playing field AT THE START of every battle". Nothing more. It's the random mm fanboys who have their panties in a bunch about win rate - not sbmm proponents. -
DeviouslyCursed: While I wasn't specific in my post, you went the wrong way
with it. I know the bad teams don't always get blownout, because
blowouts typically aren't caused by skill mismatches. The point I
had an objection with is you stating "99%" of the time the good
team gets a landslide victory, or even a victory at all. That is
not true. The bad teams win way more than 1% of those games. Show
me statistics of 30-40% chance to win games and how many the
underdogs win. It's more than 1%. Show me your data for 60-70%
chance to win, and how many of those your team still lost. It's
more than 1%. You stating 99% of the time the good teams win
is just you exaggerating because you argue in a dishonest, immature
manner.
Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?