Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?

Дата: 18.07.2021 08:53:18
View PostSimplyPzB2, on Jul 18 2021 - 06:38, said:
On blowouts. - Point 1, blowouts will still happen between two equal teams.  But BOTH TEAMS have the opportunity to generate that blowout. - Point 2, blowouts don't always happen when a good team stomps a bad team.  Map size, a couple of good players making a solid last stand, etc.can prevent a blowout.  But when a good team plays a bad team, it's 99% locked in the good team will blow out the bad team.  (That "one time once" where a bad team blew out a good team in no way negates the 99 times the good team stomps the bad team). - Additionally.  sbmm is less about blowouts, and more about 'guaranteed' results.  The greater the skill imbalance, the more likely the result is predetermined. 

DeviouslyCursed:  Point 2 is wrong. Clearly, blatantly. Just made up BS stats. I have to give you minor credit for at least admitting SBMM isn't about blowouts, but win rate. I'm guessing that's you finally admitting to SBMM giving 50% win rates to all players. Otherwise your "SBMM isn't predetermined" fails. EDIT: and HA! I got the first post on page 100. Eat that suckas! EDIT2: There should be some sort of badge for this.

Реклама | Adv