Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Дата: 22.05.2021 14:36:46
SimplyPzB2, on May 22 2021 - 08:48, said: Let me ask you this. Look at the teams below as
possible generated by the random mm:
skill team
1 team 2
purple 1(mr. 10k)
5
red
14
10 You say in your example that the 10k player "will have
combined teammates that are worse. ALWAYS" Please tell me how the
single purple (your 1ok players) on team 1 DOESN'T have 'teammates
that are worse???? Now look at what sbmm would do with those
teams: skill team
1 team 2
purple
3
3 red
12
12 Please tell me how any of the 6 purple players now has a
'worse team' than the enemy team??? Your mr. 10k now has the same
team as the enemy, which is fair. You could say team 2 'got a worse
team' BUT only in comparison to the random mm team - WHERE THEY
FACED A MUCH LESS SKILLED ENEMY. AND, both teams are equal,
so no one on team 2 got THE worst team...DeviouslyCursed: The 5 purples on team 2 now have worse teammates. Thanks once
again for proving my point: SBMM has to screw over good players to
get even teams. Under Random MM: all the players have
equivalent teammates over time. Under Random MM: all players have
the same opponents over time.Under SBMM: the good players must be
screwed over to make balanced matches. Always. The fact that
you have to keep switching your term to "team" instead of
"teammates" means you know exactly what I'm talking about. You have
to switch from the individual to the group, because with the
individuals, some are clearly getting an advantage, and some are
clearly getting screwed. And all of this is in some ignorant
attempt to make matches "close" which wont' even happen. Even with
all matches at around 50% win chance landslides still happen at
close to the same frequency (it's a 2-3% difference, that's 2 or 3
games in 100 that change).
Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?