Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?

DeviouslyCursed:  So if they were all in one tank and not in your typical pool of tanks, all it takes to throw the stats off is using a tank that you perform better than your average in. For instance if I used one of my top tier 8 prems to run a thousand battles or so and ONLY used that tank, I would be underestimated by about 8-10%. All you have demonstrated is that when you are underestimated by a stat program, you win more than expected win chance. The matches weren't actually balanced matches. Also the reason why I've said, multiple times, the only way a SBMM would have any chance of working in WoT is if it went by a per tank stat ranking.   And for your picture, the battles is unbalanced, and is fair. It is not unfair because we all have crap teams at some point. It happens. It is not rigged because all players are being treated equally, there is no evidence that anyone is getting a worse MM than anyone else. If two people are playing a game and the entire game comes down to who wins the last roll, they roll the dice, and one gets a "1" and the other gets a "6" and highest wins, the game wasn't "rigged." Random chance, as well as all the factors and decisions they made during the game, influenced the outcome. But it's not rigged. If you kept track of all the die rolls, and one player had better rolls overall, that is still random chance. It is still not rigged.