Win Rate should be Wins/(Wins + Losses)

DeviouslyCursed:  Why do you keep assuming I want this for my own stats? If I wanted to improve my stats, I'd stop drinking when I play. If I wanted more impressive stats for the forums, I'd post with my main which has a 56% win rate over 24K battles. (...and was a beta account with no stat padding, and was also basically free to play, spent $45 over about 6 yrs for 3 months of prem and a bit of gold left over for demounting equip.) Whether you like it or not, humans do associate importance with milestones (numbers divisible by ten, for instance, and especially midpoint numbers). I simply pointed out it's a way for WG to get more people over this threshold without impacting anything at all. Most people that don't think too much into it will assume 50% is the average as well. So having all these people fall short when they are actually at average or slightly above, creates a "bad taste" for no reason other than a minor definition of what Win Rate should be. If it improves people's outlook on the game and their performance, where is the harm in changing it? You are the one that seems all worked up about it like it's going to crash the world or something. Also, Win Rate as a percentage of wins verses losses is also based on facts. It is very simple. I'm not sure why you are missing this.