Win Rate should be Wins/Losses
Дата: 09.05.2021 00:03:25
ProfessionalFinn, on May 08 2021 - 19:11, said: This 50% pass-floor must be used in the Dummies School. Are
you an alumnus? First time I have ever heard of such a
thing. But there are plenty of screwy and fruitcake
posts in this forum. DeviouslyCursed:
dunniteowl, on May 08 2021 - 21:36, said: In NO school I ever attended (and I attended 20 schools during the
course of my education, both primary and secondary) did a 50% score
PASS. In fact, 60% was usually a D, which is a NOT PASSING
grade. Below 60% was usually considered an F. F = FAIL.
I have no idea where you got this idea from, but whichever
schools you went to? They FAILED you. Or, you weren't
paying enough attention and they simply 'passed' you out of their
classes so that they wouldn't have to see you in the same chair as
last year. 50% pass? FAIL! OMG SMHD FAIL
OvODeviouslyCursed: It all depends on the class, school, etc. Some college
courses I had getting anywhere close to a 50% on a test and you
were one of the top scores. One particular test I remember was a
Biomed/Biophysics course and one of the tests had a single question
"Smoking causes cancer. Why?" with 3 blank pages attached for you
to write your answer. This was not discussed in class. At all. You
had to use your knowledge of the lungs and tissues to come up with
an answer, as detailed as possible. Right or wrong, you were judged
by how well you knew the systems and how they reacted. Anyway,
acting like 60% is a pure cutoff and should only be that way or the
school fails is just ridiculous. It's also worth noting that this
was a EBME course (Biomedical Engineering) at a school that was
ranked #2 in the nation for it (this was in the mid 1990s). So if
you think that school was fail, it's you that are failing.
Win Rate should be Wins/Losses