Unpopular opinion.....

DeviouslyCursed:  1. The following shows the assumptions you made just at the start of your flawed "study."A. You assumed an equation used for real life assessments would also be valid for non real life engagementsB. You assumed this would work for all video gamesC. Even if this works for some video games, you assumed it would work for WoT What method did you use to conclude that it does, in fact, work for video games? All video games. Because if it's not going to work for all of them (and it won't, btw), then you have to figure out if it works one by one. How did you do that? Did you do that? Of course you didn't. Do you know how I know? Because the only way to test if it works is to do a study on being a tank down and seeing if it matches up. Your "study" (if you can call it that) did not show WoT MM was rigged, it showed your equation doesn't work for WoT. Someone who is "quite smart" would know that. You, sir, are not smart. In order for a study like yours to show MM is rigged, you would play the same tanks on multiple accounts over lots of battles and get vastly different results. That would indicate bias at the account level. 2. MoE does not guarantee higher Win Rate. Why? Because trash damage exists. MoE is not an indicator of getting wins. Especially not a single MoE which is fairly easy to get. 3. Doesn't matter what tier you play most. Middle tiers and low tiers inflate your win rate, especially when playing the stronger tanks over and over. If you win rate is barely over 50% at the kiddie level, you are going to get wrecked in high tier. Again, someone who is "quite smart" would know this too, given the number of games you've played.