Open League Championship Series, Spring 2013
Дата: 19.05.2013 03:38:11
maverick3, on May 12 2013 - 03:17, said: Any word what they are going to do about the flubbed schedule on
May fifth? We had two matches at once, but couldn't play both.
MechEng03, on May 16 2013 - 13:54, said: Captain Judo,
My team is 16-1 not 16-2. The error is probably a double count with this match: !!!ANYBODY CAN JOIN!!! 0:1 !!!Anyone can join!!!
Thanks,
Mech
EDIT: Same goes for Scurry Hard. They only have one loss.
Unker, on May 17 2013 - 20:07, said: For the coordinators, there are five errors in the standings (Assuming the battle results on the web page are accurate):
1. !!!Anyone can join!!! should have 1 win instead of 2. I think this was already posted in here by the team.
2. The Think Tank has the correct W/L/D showing, but it calculates to 38 points instead of 36.
3. 4SAKN Tank has the correct W/L/D showing, but it calculates to 22 points instead of 21.
4. 2nd Battalion @2nd Marines should have 6 wins instead of 5.
5. SAVAGES should have 2 wins instead of 1.
I should also point out that even though its not in the rules, you are going to need an additional tiebreaker. The format of one battle/3 opponents per night seems like a fun format for the open league, but it negates games lost/won as a valid tiebreaker. You can use heads up, strength of opponents, random/coin flip or something. With the current standings, you don't need this to determine the top 64, but you will need it to seed to tournament. For example, Scurry Hard and Lincoln Brigade are tied for 6th. They obviously will make the tournament, but one has to be 6th seed and one 7th, since their matchups in the tournament will be different.
maverick3, on May 16 2013 - 21:39, said: I am still waiting for a offical response from tournaments@wargamingamerica from the Fracas tier 6 tournamet. We were all sent a consolation prize but still have heard nothing on that tournament or this one.
Captain_Judo: Tonight, teams with 15 battles (or less) will have an opportunity
to play additional battles.
As for those teams mischeduled on May 4th, your wins from that night will stand. However, your losses will be removed from your battle count. After removing those losses, if your battle count is 15 or below, you will also have an opportunity (tonight) to play additional battles.
As for those teams mischeduled on May 4th, your wins from that night will stand. However, your losses will be removed from your battle count. After removing those losses, if your battle count is 15 or below, you will also have an opportunity (tonight) to play additional battles.
MechEng03, on May 16 2013 - 13:54, said: Captain Judo,
My team is 16-1 not 16-2. The error is probably a double count with this match: !!!ANYBODY CAN JOIN!!! 0:1 !!!Anyone can join!!!
Thanks,
Mech
EDIT: Same goes for Scurry Hard. They only have one loss.
Captain_Judo: Thanks for the info guys. I'll have our team review all scores
before updating the standings again.
Unker, on May 17 2013 - 20:07, said: For the coordinators, there are five errors in the standings (Assuming the battle results on the web page are accurate):
1. !!!Anyone can join!!! should have 1 win instead of 2. I think this was already posted in here by the team.
2. The Think Tank has the correct W/L/D showing, but it calculates to 38 points instead of 36.
3. 4SAKN Tank has the correct W/L/D showing, but it calculates to 22 points instead of 21.
4. 2nd Battalion @2nd Marines should have 6 wins instead of 5.
5. SAVAGES should have 2 wins instead of 1.
I should also point out that even though its not in the rules, you are going to need an additional tiebreaker. The format of one battle/3 opponents per night seems like a fun format for the open league, but it negates games lost/won as a valid tiebreaker. You can use heads up, strength of opponents, random/coin flip or something. With the current standings, you don't need this to determine the top 64, but you will need it to seed to tournament. For example, Scurry Hard and Lincoln Brigade are tied for 6th. They obviously will make the tournament, but one has to be 6th seed and one 7th, since their matchups in the tournament will be different.
Captain_Judo: Please post that in the Fracas thread and keep this thread specific
to the Open League CS.
maverick3, on May 16 2013 - 21:39, said: I am still waiting for a offical response from tournaments@wargamingamerica from the Fracas tier 6 tournamet. We were all sent a consolation prize but still have heard nothing on that tournament or this one.
Captain_Judo:
Open League Championship Series, Spring 2013