Why Guilty before proven inoccent
Дата: 07.03.2013 05:15:07
Arrowfoot, on Mar 07 2013 - 02:41, said: I am sure you guys dont want and have rules against makeing
disputes public. I would think for issues of transparence you would
want them in the open proving you have nothing to hide. That issue
aside, he has a very good point, if not made in the best way. If he
has the replayes showing that the other team brought in an over
tier tank even once, then that team should have been disqualified.
If his team had brought in the wrong tanks just once, then the
other team should need to provied the replay showing that. In rare
cases you might need all 5 but this was not one of them.Please forgive my spelling and have a nice day
Captain_Judo: The reason for keeping DQ decisions away from the public forums is
to simply avoid naming, shaming and flaming. As you can imagine,
dialogue between both sides can get heated and it's unnecessary to
highlight any ugly side of such dialogues.
I'd like to leave this thread open for the simple fact that it adds some said transparency to this process.
It's very simple: when you apply for a dispute to disqualify a team, bring all of your replays. Not just the ones that suit you best. But all of your replays.
I'd like to leave this thread open for the simple fact that it adds some said transparency to this process.
It's very simple: when you apply for a dispute to disqualify a team, bring all of your replays. Not just the ones that suit you best. But all of your replays.
Why Guilty before proven inoccent