Equipment 2.0 Is Here!
Дата: 12.08.2020 21:21:10
The_Boot, on 12 August 2020 - 12:30 AM, said: turns out the equipment you have mounted can be swapped to any box,
you dont have to dismount to move eekeeboo: I said this twice already
grasho, on 12 August 2020 - 06:31 AM, said: I will highlight this quote made by Dwigt (an official WG representative) in the “We slashed the price of premium vehicles” topic: “These decisions are made way in advance and planned for the 10 years anniversary celebration not in a week.” If this is true, then someone senior in WG must have made the decision to reduce the future performance of Battlepass equipment (so it gave a smaller performance bonus than Bounty Equipment) whilst WG was advertising that Battlepass equipment would give a bonus equal to Bounty Equipment. WG have been fraudulent. It might not have been intentional (the different teams may not have coordinated) but the end effect is still fraud.
eekeeboo: The improved equipment we answered recently that it's being looked
into how this can be used in the future without being too strong
and that some equipment is already stronger than basic or on the
same level of slot bonus.
grasho, on 12 August 2020 - 09:08 AM, said: I just found this in another forum when Sael was challenged about
WG not listening: @Sael That is a pretty
good rewriting of history and misrepresents the facts. We are
not complaining about Equip 2.0. We are complaining about the
losses and broken promises. And you are not listening.
You are trying to ignore us whilst sharing the lie that we
are negative about the equipment and, therefore, can be ignored.
So I again ask you to publish the survey / feedback where
players asked for WG: to force players to decrease the
value of demounted equipment by 40%. to reduce the effectiveness of
Battlepass Equipment. to charge gold to demount nets and binocs. to
limit demount kits so the lack of demount kits prevents players
from benefitting from the new equipment. You can easily shut
us up: provide the evidence that the majority of players asked for
the above. Or will you do your usual? Ignore us,
misrepresent us, hide, lie to us, then tell us you are listening?
eekeeboo: I'm sure you know from your professional experience you don't give
your sensitive data out publicly, in no uncertain terms. You assume
the worst but don't believe that the fact people spend their free
time to talk to you should represent that they're trying to help
where possible and no one is in fact out to get your, or your
chocolate.
BRONSON1972, on 12 August 2020 - 03:21 PM, said: Take a look at the majority of posts on this topic, most are
complaining about this update, hardly anyone wanted it or likes it
in the playing community, so they didnt listen to the majority of
players.eekeeboo: "Majority" this is going to be a chore, I know, but I have to ask
for your own sake of understanding, please go through the whole
thread, count the number of different respondants, then divide into
positive and negative. Then you get each category and put them into
the sections for each positive and negative, how many align on each
negative and then you have the representative. Then once you do all
that, compare to the entire playerbase, and also look at other
platforms like Discord where the feedback is different. Then the
next part is something you can't do and you look into the player
type and how much they invest into the game, are they f2p are the
relaxed/casual and so on and so forth.
Smegger213, on 12 August 2020 - 03:38 PM, said: Exactly this. NOBODY ASKED FOR THE EQUIPMENT CHANGES. NOBODY ASKED FOR REMOVAL OF MOVING BINOS ETC FOR FREE. NOBODY ASKED FOR REMOVAL OF SLOTS FOR LOW TIERS. #WalletClosed #GameStaysUninstalled
eekeeboo: That you know of. Please don't spam the same message, it's against
the forum rules
grasho, on 12 August 2020 - 03:43 PM, said: Oh, you’re right about timetables and content. However, as an ex-developer, ex-PRINCE2 project manager and as an ex-ITIL Release manager, I would suggest that Industry Best Practice is to know the content and resources available before you agree a timetable. If your project plan allows you to suddenly, a few weeks before a major release, change the solution, then it suggests that the planning has gone awry and that you had waste (and therefore unnecessary cost) in the project. I don’t think any Project Manager would want to admit that. Now, “rapid‘ and ”agile” application development methods can give you more flexibility, but Dwigt’s response (things being decided months ago) suggests a company with a more conventional control culture. However, I could be wrong, in which case there was plenty of time (6 weeks or so) to identify the contentious areas and mitigate them, either through changes to the solution or by engaging with the customer to explain why the upside of the changes are greater than the downsides (this is my ICT Customer Relationship experience coming through). This did not happen. You are right that they didn’t listen to me. They also didn’t listen to (or engage with) anyone else who expressed concerns about the Equip 2.0 conversion process or the Improved Equipment situation.
Instead, they let it fester and fuelled the resulting backlash. Sael, Dwigt et al failed to manage customers, failed to engage, failed to explain and, ultimately, failed their employer by not handling a difficult situation. I might not agree with what Eekeeboo posted, but at least he tried.
eekeeboo: I always try and I can't say for the forums in terms of engagement,
but I know I specifically did with a Q&A with the head of game
design on equipment 2.0 stream
There's only so much I can do
though. I'm sure other WG staff give the feedback they can in the
manner they can, I'm just a giant nerd who never stops
reading!
Erwin_Von_Braun, on 12 August 2020 - 04:42 PM, said: Have you tried WarThunder yet? It's a different animal for sure but
still very entertaining. 16:44 Added after 2 minute
Unfortunately, this is classic WG - disengaging from their paying
customers when times are tough is a pretty poor attitude and I
think it highlights the level of contempt they have for us.
Speaking of which, they seem to have disappeared AGAINeekeeboo: Unfortunately, this is classic WG - disengaging from their paying
customers when times are tough is a pretty poor attitude and I
think it highlights the level of contempt they have for us.
Speaking of which, they seem to have disappeared AGAIN
Sorry for my absence, I'm sure you
remember my active days, I have a new responsibility at the moment
and moving countries absorbs what little free time I have left,
please note you're not abandoned though. 18:23 Added
after 2 minute
grasho, on 12 August 2020 - 04:57 PM, said: I spent ten years on the customer service front line, facing up to customers and suppliers as needed. My customers were used to never being challenged, were trained to kill, and had access to high-tech weaponry
eekeeboo: In all this experience, how much chocolate did you develop and
amass (You started this chocolate!)
BRONSON1972, on 12 August 2020 - 05:56 PM, said: I haven't spoken to a member of my clan yet who likes any of
the changes, there is a small % who have not been on the game for a
while, and others I have not had chance to talk to yet, but I have
spoken to most of them. Hardly any of them are playing it now, and
those that do are not staying on long any how as there is no one
for them to team with, none of the members I spoke to said they
were going to spend money on the game anymore. No not you in
particular all staff, if you predicted the backlash from this
update why did you not warn them against it ? I want nothing
more than to play this game again but the changes are too many, too
soon and none are good in my opinion, if they implemented them over
a period of time and compensated those of us who had been playing
longest, also too much change all at once is a lot to have to learn
for a lot of my clan, most of my clan are aged 55 - 70+ , its more
of a retirement clan, we don't like change especially when its not
nice and all at once.eekeeboo: Because as I mentioned with feedback I can give what I see and
hear, and then you allow the decision to go forward with people who
have access to all information and data and feedback. My job is to
understand (which I do) the reason for change and I still believe
it's a positive one. The feedback also showed a lot of people do
like the change, and while a lot of people didn't like only 30
demount kits, they liked the rest for the most part. And this comes
down to... OK give 40 demount kits will it help? no. Give 100, will
it help? no, 200, will it help? no. And so you get to the point
where.... you draw the line
18:24 Added after
3 minuteOK Wall of eek text done (OLD TIMES!) and I believe Erwin I
answere you question, and I think I answered most peoples points. I
wish you luck and I can't promise I'll be back for a while.
Equipment 2.0 Is Here!














