Defenders, Assemble!
Дата: 29.03.2019 18:30:34
Cobra6, on 29 March 2019 - 02:04 PM, said: But does it have an overal net positive impact on gameplay
or not (both in randoms and more competitive modes)? Cobra 6eekeeboo: Overall the impact has not been shown to be negative if it
was there would be a removal like the SU76/Type 59 etc.
undutchable80, on 29 March 2019 - 02:18 PM, said: eekeeboo: I will do so! Make it clear for Moonbase funding that this
is integral
16:32 Added after 1 minute
arthurwellsley, on 29 March 2019 - 03:05 PM, said: That is not an excuse to re-sell it on the EU cluster the
damn thing is an abomination that ruins the MM for people in other
tier VIII or VII heavy tanks. The Defender/Object 252U was balanced
when that incompetent fool Murazor was put in charge of the balance
department and like all the tanks "balanced" under him it has over
buffed armour. The Defender/Object 252U has better armour
than the tech tree tier IX T-10, and it's armour is only marginally
weaker than the tier X IS7, and that is what makes it such a
disaster for the MM. Ok the gun is worse than that on the IS3 at
tier VIII which just makes it slightly irritating to play, but the
armour makes it painful to play against for the majority of the
tanks it meets. When WG said that they would reduce sales of
the Defender/Object 252U they should have stuck to their word, and
only put them in the Christmas gambling boxes and left it at that.
Once a year sales of this abomination are quite sufficient. But I
suppose loads will be bought sadly, and WG will think the profit
was good, whilst at the same time losing their customers trust, and
by spoiling the MM for other players alienating more of their
paying customers. Not selling Defender/Object 252U's on the
EU ever again would have made WG customers happier even if it might
take longer to reach the profit bottom line. Selling this
abomination is like drinking cheap fizzy sugar drinks, it will give
you a quick burst of energy (for WG a quick burst of cash) but at
the cost of rotting your teeth (for WG at the cost of rotting your
relationship long term with your paying customers and their
loyalty). This is a very bad idea and the marketing, long
term customer retention and strategy departments should hang their
heads in shame for their failure to perceive the damage the sale
does to the company in the long term.eekeeboo: Not selling a tank for people who want to buy it may have
made certain people happy and not others, let alone with the
natural cycle of players who have bought it and stop and those who
start and would like one. As long as you brush your
teeth properly fizzy drinks are perfectly safe for your teeth, they
just risk making you fat. 16:33 Added after 2 minutes
Zoggo_, on 29 March 2019 - 03:30 PM, said: And that's why I would never be a Community Manager ! Things you
know and would love to tell us but can't. Anyhow, please give
the MM Devs a kick up the backside and tell em to hurry up Eek
! Coffee and Vanilla ice cream. Yum eekeeboo: I LOVE coffee ice cream! 
Defenders, Assemble!














