Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Get Ready to Try Out the New Matchmaker

Дата: 12.03.2019 14:36:46
View PostTungstenHitman, on 12 March 2019 - 12:29 PM, said:   Not at all in fact that's what I'm highlighting most. I left a non offensive, short and non toxic comment in regards to WG still not reducing arty numbers per battle like pretty much every single player that doesn't predominantly play arty wants, yet that get's removed and I get a warning for "non-constructive" which is actually just a case of me being pegged and penalized for the negative feedback you just outlines was fine and actively encouraged. There's just no consistency and mods badly need to get together, have a little meeting between yourselves and outline what's considered acceptable and what's not because as it stands, one mod pegs a player for something really mundane or genuinely not toxic or offensive while other genuinely toxic and offensive threads and comments are simply ignored, not just for a day or two, but weeks and months.   Did someone actually report me for outlining that WG ignored one of the most sought after requests by non-arty players which is to reduce arty numbers per battle? I VERY much doubt that, so the mod himself/herself decided themselves they didn't like it, not because the comment was toxic or offensive since it wasn't, just simply because they decided it wasn't constructive which you just outlined is fine and encouraged yet that particular mod didn't think so, nor do from what I'm seeing, any mods think it's wrong for the constant use of words like cancer to describe game elements as either their thread or comments within or have avatars or names featuring ppl with special needs or conditions. No, peg the guy who found fault with arty numbers not being changed and give him a warning. 

eekeeboo:   Constructive feedback is what you like or how you think things could improve. Your post wasn't constructive it was a criticism of things how you would like to see them done and anything else is not bothering. While simultaneously trying to add digs about WG, developers and the player base. I'm sure you may believe this to be perfectly fine, but the rules clearly state that to be constructive and not break things in those areas.    And you talk about feedback being negative that should be allowed, the key here is to be constructive. Just complaining and insulting someone or people either directly or indirectly on the issue is not constructive. The fact remains that the MM thread is about MM changes that are being tested, not about derailing into how you feel about whether artillery should be allowed or not or how they should be limited in battles. Just as using words like "cancer" to describe things in the game is also not acceptable, when they're found they are also moderated.    The thing you need to take away is you need to worry first about your own contributions and how they break the rules, not look to other people and use them as an excuse for your own bars on rule breaking. If you see something breaking a rule, then report it. On the off chance it hasn't already been done so or is in the process of being moderated. 

Реклама | Adv