Public Test 1.4 Changes to Reward Tanks
Дата: 24.01.2019 19:33:20
blockypanzer, on 23 January 2019 - 05:43 PM, said: For someone who accused me of not reading posts, you seem to have
not read my post. I specified the range (200m), the target
(lower front plate) and the % of hits and pens. For the record,
some shots missed the LFP, hit the turret or UFP and obviously
bounced, but for the purpose of the test (sniping at 200m with the
Leo at a fairly large weakspot on an IS7) the accuracy % ought to
be measured by shots actually landing where you aim them. I
brought up this video/test as an example of the game mechanics
which, as a player you have no power over, causing a very high rate
of misses. That was with a very accurate gun (maxed out Leo is 0.27
acc) vs a large weakspot (LFP of IS7) at reasonably close range
(200m) with both vehicles totally stationary and every shot fully
aimed. In the context of Ville67's point about the Object
279e cupola and missing it 95% of the time (which I still believe
you belittled in your reply, which you A. denied sending, and B.
seem to think was acceptable for someone in your position) we're
talking real game scenarios, where the enemy is likely moving,
fully aiming your shots is a luxury that cannot usually be
afforded, and range may not be so close. As I said, even if you had
an aimbot that locked onto that tiny weakspot, by the mechanics of
the game alone, you'd miss it 95% of the time like they said. Guns
in world of tanks are not lasers, and after 45K battles you should
know well enough that weakspots like this are not worth even trying
to hit under most conditions. Despite knowing this, you still
suggested the player was at fault and not the game mechanics
relating to weapon accuracy, or the laughably small size of the
weakspot in the first place. Your reply took a valid concern (the
only frontal weakspot is tiny and all-but impossible to hit) and
threw it back at the player, implying they were directly at fault
and should do something about it themselves. At what
point are you going to take on board some feedback from these
forums without dismissing it, belittling people's concerns about
the game, changing the topic, or just outright deleting posts? Can
we get another team member to speak to us about this please?eekeeboo: Yes I read it, once again there's a difference between
"Missing shots 95% of the time" and "Not hitting and penetrating
70% of the time". Please take the time to read the full response,
unless you're saying he missed 95% of his shots and the 5% that hit
only 30% penned? It's not about belittling it's about
making realistic claims, if you make an unrealistic claim to try
and prove a point, you need to consider carefully what you say.
Again, when this becomes unrealistic to expect people to think and
consider before making wild and untrue claims. Guns aren't lasers,
but the only reason you would EVER miss the cupola 95% of the time
is if you're at an extreme range or an odd angle. Furthermore, if
you are going to sit there in that situation, you cannot blame the
tank because you were unwilling to re-aim, relocate or change
tactic. If you're aiming at the cupola and relying on
this shot to get damage, there's a great deal many things you could
have done leading up to this point to avoid that, least of
which.... moving. There's a difference between taking on legitimate
feedback and having to say to not encouraging to get better at a
game or call people out on lies, false claims and inaccurate or
biased opinions. For deleting posts, it's simple.
Follow the forum rules, don't get punishment. The fact you're
talking about the forum moderation, breaks the forum rules. People
who have posts deleted and here yourself, simply NOT reading what
you're being asked to read. At a certain stage I shouldn't need to
keep reminding you and pointing out to you, read the rules. It
doesn't matter how you feel about the rules, they are there for a
reason. You can follow them and stay on the forum, or you can keep
breaking them and leave the forum. It's your choice.
Public Test 1.4 Changes to Reward Tanks














