R.I.P. WoT

eekeeboo:   Hummus: You sir have just substantiated my whole statement, Thank-you. I would counter your statements with views/opinions and justifications, but i feel this is your approach to this disccussion.     Gkirmathal: I agree but like the original post complains at low fps, look at the mods installed... it's the first thing i noticed. Like with any game you don't want it to break regular, leave it to the professionals. I also agree with you to some extent about the release something when it's done rather than piece by piece but also, at least this way it must be easier to identify, diagnose and remedy issues with a game rather than all at once and finding the issue. Also thanks for the +1    Dutchmul: Oddly the game has been fine for myself even to the point where i add mods and it's done nothing to my fps or game and I've been tinkering a hell of a lot to find the issues, contradictory my father has had crashes permanently last night and couldn't fix it using no mods etc. Fresh install and it seems to be going well, but he's on an old PC etc.    CptBarney: There's no better way to get feedback on a games changes than going live and testing it on your whole user base, as even the test server doesn't get tested nearly as much or by such a large demographic of players/machines etc.    And to finish this post for now, a lot of people need to remember where this game started off and what it started from in terms of size/engine etc. People say they don't want improvements, but I bet you're happy for physics, for tier changes, for new tanks, hell new models have been changed anyway, people were happy with map changes. And if you really want to see the big picture and you think WG are constantly getting things wrong. I should point you to the beta of tanks to the current date. And I will then ask you to compare what's gone right and what's gone wrong in that whole time. How many of those changes have been positive and have helped to make the game better for more people and fair?