Update 9.22 Preview—USSR Tree Revision

VanGore78, on 11 January 2018 - 06:26 PM, said: I often criticize WG for many decisions, but I NEVER DO IT BEFORE I TESTED or EXPERIENCED the changes.   I suppose u guys are all super testers or how else would you already know that the new tanks are crap or OP?    1) On paper these plans look good to me. A fourth rear mounted HT is very welcome (or second if we talk about researchable)   2) Obj. 430, is rarely played, even after several buffs. So a change is required. I would have favored if WG brings in the rear mounted MTs first, but the other way round is fine too. A more competitive tank similar to the 121 would be welcome.     3) Obj. 263 is rarely played, on several maps it is simply unplayable. Its open roof makes it a horrible arty bait in the current MM/arty meta. That said I would prefer that this tank becomes a collector gem and remains on T10 as a special vehicle. Maybe there were no other suitable iterations of Object 268 Variant 4 for T9.   4) New HT from T10...we will see what WG will put in the game. I already collected 200k XP on my t-10 while three marking it. I am curious and eager to discover the new entry. Probably something similar to the 113.