Women in World War II: On the Home Front and Beyond

TheKroo:   Hello,   First of all, thank you for taking your time to express your opinion and providing us with feedback. Still, I need to debate over a few points you have raised:   The videos We have had some excellent feedback from our community regarding the videos, both online and in person. Furthermore, our statistics show that our videos are doing extremely well. We do not only track the views, we also track the average time viewed as well as numerous other analytic, and they are all saying we are on the right path. We are of course always open for feedback and criticism, anything that can help us improve, but please consider we have to look at the bigger picture and making the majority of our community happy. I am afraid there will always be disagreements, tastes differ. it is human nature. Nevertheless your feedback helps us close that gap - so please share with us what you dislike in our videos. At end, we make them for you, our players.   The article I am saddened to read how you feel about what was written here. We take great pride into building an interest in people to learn more of history, and we dedicate a great deal of time and effort on how to best present a certain topic. We always consider the presentation, as we wish to spark the interest in the topic, not just lay out the fact. I am afraid some topic remain unchanged, so you will always encounter certain same facts no matter of avenue of approach. That is because we work with facts, proven facts, and they do not often change, therefore we are bound to repeat certain things that you may encounter at other sources - it does not mean we did not do our homework. Quite the contrary, if you have a look at our sources, just the ones listed, not to mention books and authors experience, you can see that we take fact checking very seriously.   UK, USSR, and a few more... We have tried to cover the pivotal nations of World War II. The name itself says it all - World War: it is very hard to mention by name every single nation, and in no way was it our intent to deliberately exclude anyone. Nor have we done that. We have in no way or shape specified that only those nations or their female populous have taken part, simply to mention every single nation would create for a very long article, and I am afraid we have to take into consideration the readability of one topic. We aim to incite interest, and of course that we will not be able to tell you everything in one single go, but if you are truly interested, we have done our job, and are happy to future provide you with information. I am afraid, I have to disagree with you in this content being bad for the "youngsters". There are no contradicting information nor false information. Rather if this would spark their interest we would be very happy. As for the "random" partisans from Yugoslavia: we have referenced that fact due to pivotal part of women in Yugoslavia during WWII - and the way their role was presented post-war, an unique instance, thus worth mentioning.   In short, if you would be so kind to highlight which part of the article is not factually correct, I would be happy to discuss it. Otherwise we remain at the premises of subjective opinion, where I must disagree with you.