Дата: 24.12.2013 13:02:33
klesk, on 23 December 2013 - 08:16 PM, said: Well... the thing is that RHA equivalent is very bad
equivalent for armor thicknes and penetration, becouse... man this
is complicated. OK... if you want to penetrate more RHA you
basicaly have to concentrate more force into smaller area. So now
we have modern APFSDS penetrators that fly fast, they are dense and
have small surface area, about 30mm caliber. Now if we simply want
to penetrate more RHA we can make even slender and longer
penetrator, and it will penetrate more RHA. But it will probably
fail to penetrate more into modern composite armor. Why?
When projectile hits RHA... basicaly rolled homonegous
steel, with such forces and such pressures steel acctualy behaves
as fluid. Armor "swims" throught armor, and it bends steel on the
sides to penetrate... it's just like bullet traveling through
water, force remains concentrate and projectile loses relatively
small amounts of force while it travels. But modern armor...
the principle of basicaly every modern composite armor and even ERA
is to spread the force of the projectile into the larger area, the
principle is the same, but diferent armors do that in diferent
ways. One of those ways is to have sandwitch of britle but
hard ceramics (even glass will do it), behind that tough steel,
behind that air, then again ceramics, steel air. When AP
hits that sandwitch... first it hit ceramics, ceramics brakes into
smaller pieces, and steel behind that ceramics bends. AP projectile
has penetrated, but it has spent a lot of energy to do that kind of
work (shatering ceramics, and bending the steel behind it) basicaly
AP energy was disipetated over the larger area, and then it has to
do the same on the every other layer of sanwitch. If the AP
penetrator is too long, too britle it will broke into two or more
pieces and then every piece will have less energy. So...
while the RHA equivalent was pretty good for WW 2, today it is...
well basicaly poo, becouse in modern times things are much much
more complicated. So many diferent kinds of armors, that work in
diferent ways, and so many diferent penetrators... the only
reliable data is from the testing ranges, and actual wars that were
fought.
http://fofanov.armor.kiev.ua/Tanks/TRIALS/19991020.html
TheKroo: This is really nicely explained :) And to get back to
topic: