Super Conq.
Дата: 01.11.2017 18:55:02
ares354, on 01 November 2017 - 05:45 PM, said: You as WG always say stats will tell. Stats tell that Tiger 2 for years is crap, and what WG DID ? Nothing.
Do stats tell that 263 is bad ? Because low popularity of line come from bad tanks like tier 7, 8 and 9, no 10, 10 is beast for many players and very fun tank to play.
@Brumbarr last four weeks for tier 10 HT http://wot-news.com/...ver/eu/norm/en
E100 under 47% WR,FV 2315 and E5 as well bad. WZ 5a in top 3.
MrConway: We're currently doing all the re-balancing and I hope and
think that we will also look at the Tiger II as it is one of my
favourite tanks!
Anxter_, on 01 November 2017 - 05:48 PM, said: The tbh, it makes sense not to give the conqueror as many
weaknesses as the 215b because it was just crap. And
no, the super conqueror doesn't appear to be overpowered at all.
The gun is amazing, sure and the hulldown is very very strong, but
it doesn't really have any staying power outside of the hulldown
because the lower plate is so bad and you have to expose it while
sidescraping and the side really doesn't stand up against type 5
heavies or E-100s spamming HE. It's good, but it isn't retard proof
and it's perfectly beatable in most tanks that aren't just
underpowered atm. The only question I have is why the STB-1,
leopard and especially the 121b are allowed to exist in this state.
WG vastly overestimates the value of mobility.MrConway: Agreed, the FV215b turret was just too weak which made the
whole tank it bit pointless. I don't have those mediums and
no access to the data right now so I can't say much about them.
Super Conq.