Facepalms incoming: WGs last Q&A.

Snowjaguar, on 14 December 2017 - 10:20 AM, said: Thank you for the offer about think hearing your opinion as a player though. We're 99.9% players here and we all have our own story to tell and argue about.


Cobra6, on 14 December 2017 - 10:23 AM, said:   I'd like you, as a developer, to try and explain how the Type5 is fine and the Leopard is a good medium while looking at these statistics/facts.   Cobra 6


commer, on 14 December 2017 - 10:29 AM, said:   So basically you are not balancing the game with the use of hard data but listen forum feedback and social media? YOU ARE THE DEVELOPERS NOT THE PLAYERS you should be more qualified to make such decisions. Imagine carmakers made engineering decisions based on random mail they get. Cars would be amazing. Ffs. I'm an ex engineer and I used to work on some fancy full suspension bikes and companies who designed bikes that customers THOUGHT they wanted got screwed because they had bad bikes. The guys who listened to hard facts and data had good bikes their customers like despite not listening to them in the design process.    Reading the last part basically invalidates your first part. If being a developer is hard then why the hell do you listen to the uninformed massess? Also we all know that's a lie since you claim Defender is balanced (against TVP) or that Type5 is not a problem despite there being a huge outcry towards them from the community. So please decide if it's hard and you know better or you listen to the community. You can't have both.