Revealing Allies Positions
Дата: 21.10.2013 20:48:10
BodyGuardOfLies, on 21 October 2013 - 03:28 PM, said: Here is the reply to the ticket which I raised about this incident
as I have no faith in the ingame reporting system.Iva Medeiros Today at 07:08
Hello Tank Commander BodyGuardOfLies,
Thank you for contacting Support reporting this unfair behavior and thank you for the provided battle replay. I'm sorry you have experienced such an unpleasant situation.
We always try to maintain a positive environment in our game so all the player truly enjoy their gaming experience.
I understand that it can frustrating to have your game ruined by these type of actions. In
the hopes of improving our customer service we have, since very early on, been
refining the in-game reports system to make sure it would cover the
eventualities needed by our players on a day to day basis. At this time we are confident enough that our
system is working well. Enough to handle all your report requests and enough
parameters have been included and cross checked to ensure its fairness and
effectiveness.
You can read more about it here: http://worldoftanks....mplaint-system.
Rest assured every report is investigated and, if needed, the appropriate actions taken regarding the reported player. Unfair playing will not go unpunished.
Please keep in mind that players who are “offending” in any way, usually are so in a consistent manner. So do not worry if you used all of your daily complaints, this player is bound to be reported by someone else soon.
Thank you for your understanding and collaboration in helping us keep a clean and fair gaming environment.
See you in the battlefield!
Regards,
Iva Medeiros
EU Customer Service Team
https://support.worldoftanks.eu
Here is the warning I was given when I originally posted this topic with a poll.
Please be respectful of the rules and proper forum etiquette in your future communications on these forums and avoid prohibited behavior. If you plan on making a poll, do so that shows no bias or hint of negativity or approval that could have some influence on the decision of the voters. All you've done is made a poll about a ingame function that you were on the recieving end of some negativity and thus created a whine/rant poll about the issue of Allied position reporting. As such, the poll and thread have been closed and removed. Please make sure any polls you create in the future contain no bias, no whine/rant and is of a constructive nature.The warning you have received serves for educational purposes. You may receive one more such warnings prior to being issued with more severe measures or sanctions depending on the level of infraction
Kind Regards
RogDodgeUK
Here is a link to the swiftly archived original post with the offending poll.
http://forum.worldof...__fromsearch__1
Here is a link to iScending English Community Coordinator stating earlier in this thread, "Interesting read and I see both sides of the coin here." and "Anyhow, guys, this is good feedback!"
http://forum.worldof...age__st__20#top
Bit of an own goal by the moderator here and yet more proof that the moderating team are not singing off the same hymn sheet. It is fortunate that despite crude attempts to stifle this topic I was so incensed that I tried a second time to put it forward for debate as it seems that many of you have something to say on the topic.
I did contact the moderator in question about his decision to close the original thread but he just referred me back to the warning stating "Thankyou for your message. All the information you seek was written in the warning that you received. Please re-read it."
Personally I feel that this is no justification and not a suitable explanation for his heavy handed approach which in my opinion leaves him looking petty and could be seen as an abuse of power.
I dare say that the moderators may well scare up some rule or other which I have no doubt broken but everything I have written here is documented and so if I am not afraid of scrutiny why should the people charged with upholding the rules fear it?
after all Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
I have enjoyed reading your thoughts on this topic and it is interesting to see that the problem is as widespread as I first thought.
I found iScending's statement "However I can't help but feel that this is something that happens quite rarely and that most of the time (for me at least) the interaction between teams tend to be rather civil. Come to think of it, it could be because I have a big [WG] tag after my name...." most humorous.
Maybe it is time for you to take a leaf from Henry the fifths book and walk among your people in disguise so as to ascertain their true mood. I don't think you are allowed a second account on the same server but for you I am sure they would make an exception. Might I suggest that you name the account Henry le roi as a nod to the mighty bard.
Regards
BodyGuardOfLies
IPaul72: Hello there BodyGuardOfLies
First of all may I apologise for the actions of the moderator and closing of the topic, this matter has been dealt with and the topic re opened.
iScending, he is a funny fella
but I can assure you he
does care and is like the rest of us here in the community team. He
plays the game and knows what we are facing it is a common thing
that we discuss as a team. So hence the final
statement "walk among your people in disguise so as to
ascertain their true mood" we do and we try our best to represent
you all, but the book doesn't stop with the En team. We contact the
relevant people and they contact theirs then a decision is made
after hearing all the arguments measuring pro and cons. But we
always pass forward the suggestions be them good or bad
So in all we here value each and every opinion and try our best to make you all heard. This is why we ask such suggestions to be constructive and discussed in a reasonable manner, this makes handing feedback easier and more swift. Just about all of us are here because we care and want to see the best of the game. Also when something is noticed to be wrong we try to correct it. Sometimes people are too passionate about the changes, others see the light side (which is a good thing doesn't this mean they care any less) and some of us just sit back and see each side and take the reasonable approach. We are all approach things in a different way which is just perfect.
As a wise man once said:
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
Winston Churchill
Kind Regards
IPaul72
First of all may I apologise for the actions of the moderator and closing of the topic, this matter has been dealt with and the topic re opened.
iScending, he is a funny fella
but I can assure you he
does care and is like the rest of us here in the community team. He
plays the game and knows what we are facing it is a common thing
that we discuss as a team. So hence the final
statement "walk among your people in disguise so as to
ascertain their true mood" we do and we try our best to represent
you all, but the book doesn't stop with the En team. We contact the
relevant people and they contact theirs then a decision is made
after hearing all the arguments measuring pro and cons. But we
always pass forward the suggestions be them good or bad
So in all we here value each and every opinion and try our best to make you all heard. This is why we ask such suggestions to be constructive and discussed in a reasonable manner, this makes handing feedback easier and more swift. Just about all of us are here because we care and want to see the best of the game. Also when something is noticed to be wrong we try to correct it. Sometimes people are too passionate about the changes, others see the light side (which is a good thing doesn't this mean they care any less) and some of us just sit back and see each side and take the reasonable approach. We are all approach things in a different way which is just perfect.
As a wise man once said:
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
Winston Churchill
Kind Regards
IPaul72
Revealing Allies Positions