Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Chinese Tier 6 medium - Type 58 - thoughts?
Link on message: #12864230
Link on message: #12864230
Draschel: It is a comfortable tank. It is not an excellent tank, it is not a
terrible tank, its range is somewhere smack dab in the
middle. The view range is alright, the DPM is alright, alpha
is alright, gun handling alright, mobility is alright. Alot
of 'alright'Armor sort of on the low side, but enough for a lowly
med. Turrets decent. Biggest problem you will run into is
penetration. Both AP and APCR are low
Subject: KV-2...well that was interesting
Link on message: #12864225
PTwr, on Jun 30 2021 - 10:22, said: Upper side of T1/M6/OI, the strip above tracks, has less armor than
155mm HE penetration. Penetration results in full HE damage. It has
been like that since 2011, nothing changed there.
Link on message: #12864225

Draschel: I didn't ask about 'how' it happened. I asked about,
show us in replay or pick, when it happened. And what exactly
happened
Subject: Incoming! Can you hear me now? Verizon customer bonus code!
Link on message: #12864027
Dylandog06, on Jun 29 2021 - 09:57, said: Why is it saying they have no codes and to comeback in 48 hours????
Richman, on Jun 29 2021 - 14:24, said: me too if ya don't mind.... tia I get no response to the their
button click.... this is probably just for new verizon
accounts.
Link on message: #12864027

KRZYBooP: There happens to be a lot more Verizon customers than was
anticipated so more needed to be created.

KRZYBooP: It's for all accounts and not specific to new ones.
Subject: HE changes: You have just made the game even less fun.
Link on message: #12864010
Snohoe, on Jun 25 2021 - 00:55, said: Besides for KV2 and 183 players its a positive change. A much more
consistent round alongside the improved intuition skill, you load
it against paper tanks and when you have good flanking
opportunities. Sorry you cant just sit and aim center mass on
heavily armored tanks for 1/2 damage anymore. Was always silly that
such a important part of the game could just be avoided by pressing
3. Now if only pressing 2 could be visited now. Cost should not be
a sole balancing factor.
Link on message: #12864010

Jaguarz: I would like to add Charioteer into the mix of tanks
unreasonably effected alongside the 183 and KV2, sure its base
round is great but HESH for a gold round was situational at best
especially facing 10s, now it essentially doesnt have a gold round.
Subject: [Opiniones] Nueva temporada de Batallas Clasificatorias
Link on message: #12863979
Link on message: #12863979
Adam_Antium: ¡Saludos, comandantes! Como sabrán, llegó una nueva temporada
de Batallas Clasificatorias y nos gustaría conocer las opiniones de
la comunidad de habla hispana y sus sugerencias. ¡Que
tengan un buen día!
Subject: [Opiniones] Nueva temporada de Batallas Clasificatorias
Link on message: #12863979
Link on message: #12863979
Adam_Antina: ¡Saludos, comandantes! Como sabrán, llegó una nueva temporada
de Batallas Clasificatorias y nos gustaría conocer las opiniones de
la comunidad de habla hispana y sus sugerencias. ¡Que
tengan un buen día!
Subject: Nerfeo a la munición HE
Link on message: #12863957
Link on message: #12863957
Adam_Antium: Hilo cerrado por pedido del OP
Subject: Nerfeo a la munición HE
Link on message: #12863957
Link on message: #12863957
Adam_Antina: Hilo cerrado por pedido del OP
Subject: MM is just Garbage
Link on message: #12863924
RamaLamaDingDong1, on Jun 30 2021 - 18:34, said: You made a statement so prove it isn't. What do you know that
everyone else doesn't know that is factual or you have access to
the programing to prove this. Since the criteria for those who say
it is produce facts not opinions that it is. Prove it isn't.
Blowouts are a result of single death, early loss of HP and DPM an
occur at the top level of tournament play where the skill levels
are as balanced as they can get in a game.
Link on message: #12863924

DeviouslyCursed: 1. Fairies are real.2. Fairies are not real. These are
not equal statements. To prove the first one, all you have to do is
show a fairy or evidence of one. You can never prove the second
one. All you can do is point to the complete absence of evidence
for fairies existing and conclude that they don't exist. Same
thing for 1. MM is rigged.2. MM is not rigged. So I take
the position that MM is not rigged. My proof that MM is not rigged
is the complete lack of good evidence that it is. EDIT: and to
OP, your chance to win a match is never actually 0%. Play enough of
those matches and your team will win one of them (and you'll lose a
100% chance to win match one day also). Also, people are correct
that XVM never went higher or lower than 5/95, because of course
they knew that no match is ever 0 or 100. Ever.
Subject: Warp103 lets talk ♦ SPG's are DEAD! RIP long live SPGs ♦ Cheers Claus
Link on message: #12863511
Altwar, on Jun 29 2021 - 04:26, said: My point is that rather than looking to speak for the
majority of anyone or anything, speak on behalf of yourself.
Link on message: #12863511

Draschel: I don't produce explanations based on people's opinions.
Majority or minority. While certainly they may help my
cause. And if one person, were to label what I have to
say as parity, as actually an opinion itself.... sad indeed I
look at the game judging whats wrong and not wrong, ascertain
gameplay. Not people's opinion of what is wrong / ain't. I
base my explanations, and try to convince others merely about what
is fair and isn't fair.
DeviouslyCursed
What types of accounts got Preferent Match Making? What types of accounts got...
30.06.2021 08:14:26
Subject: What types of accounts got Preferent Match Making? What types of accounts got...
Link on message: #12863455
Piano_Puppy, on Jun 30 2021 - 03:20, said: For example in a game, there are tier 6, 7, 8 tanks , who are
forced to play tier 6 tanks, and who got the favor to
play tier 8 tanks? It's not random. THAT'S THE FACT.
Link on message: #12863455

DeviouslyCursed: Wow. The only thing that pops into my mind is: "stupid is as
stupid does."
Subject: KV-2...well that was interesting
Link on message: #12863453
Link on message: #12863453
Draschel: Can you show the 629 to M6 Please?For the advancement of
science.
Subject: Uninstalled
Link on message: #12863452
ILLR, on Jun 30 2021 - 02:48, said: DeviouslyCursed
Yesterday, 03:42 AM
View PostILLR, on Jun 29 2021 - 02:15, said:
Win Rate has dropped to 48.74 from 49.87.
Considering there was always another "now useless arty" opposite you, how did your win rate drop?
Maybe there's more going on than you think (hint: there usually is) and you are personally responsible for your new level of failure.
Hey Cursed that’s not my WR I posted that is the NA server Wr average for Conq Gun Carriage. Which continues to drop as I type. I am not purple nor blue as I think of it. 55 percenter Winrate wise. I have the basics down. I pay attention to the map. And most importantly I supported my teammates. Bread and Butter if you would of any good team. Not the Uni that’s going to hit for a 5k combined. Or the one who will die in the first 45 seconds. Playing in lights and fast meds was enjoyable. But what WGs did by completely NEUTERING a Class aka SPG.I was cheated well after tanks were earned and played. I did put money into this game including SPGs. Which at this point forget about Pubs in Ranked they are literally a wasted tank slot. I stand by what I typed. And I have every right to my say. I spent years on this game. Arty Mains did not deserve this level of Nerf. There will be no further posts from me. Rear View Mirror.
Link on message: #12863452

Yesterday, 03:42 AM
View PostILLR, on Jun 29 2021 - 02:15, said:
Win Rate has dropped to 48.74 from 49.87.
Considering there was always another "now useless arty" opposite you, how did your win rate drop?
Maybe there's more going on than you think (hint: there usually is) and you are personally responsible for your new level of failure.
Hey Cursed that’s not my WR I posted that is the NA server Wr average for Conq Gun Carriage. Which continues to drop as I type. I am not purple nor blue as I think of it. 55 percenter Winrate wise. I have the basics down. I pay attention to the map. And most importantly I supported my teammates. Bread and Butter if you would of any good team. Not the Uni that’s going to hit for a 5k combined. Or the one who will die in the first 45 seconds. Playing in lights and fast meds was enjoyable. But what WGs did by completely NEUTERING a Class aka SPG.I was cheated well after tanks were earned and played. I did put money into this game including SPGs. Which at this point forget about Pubs in Ranked they are literally a wasted tank slot. I stand by what I typed. And I have every right to my say. I spent years on this game. Arty Mains did not deserve this level of Nerf. There will be no further posts from me. Rear View Mirror.
DeviouslyCursed: You said nothing that addresses why your win rate dropped due
to nerfing arty, when arty on both sides were nerfed, and there is
always another arty set against you, so there should not be any win
rate drop. Period, end of discussion. If there was a win rate drop,
it was due to something other than the arty nerf, because all arty
opposed to you were also nerfed. Try to justify it again,
maybe you will get on something reasonable. I doubt it, but let's
see.
Draschel
What types of accounts got Preferent Match Making? What types of accounts got...
30.06.2021 08:06:53
Subject: What types of accounts got Preferent Match Making? What types of accounts got...
Link on message: #12863450
Piano_Puppy, on Jun 30 2021 - 03:58, said: ColonelShakes, Read that before, but doesn't
answer the question. But thanks anyway, kiddo. Well, thanks you
guys for your "thoughts" on the subject.
Link on message: #12863450

Draschel: Why are you insulting people? Reasons?Mind telling use your
"thought" on the subject is?I mean, for a person using the word
"fact" you didn't list a single one.
Subject: Let's bring on the paranoia
Link on message: #12863449
Stinger63, on Jun 29 2021 - 05:59, said: Because I have moved, I've had to create accounts on other servers
to keep my ping manageable. Ultimately, I simply couldn't
bare to rebuild hangars full of tanks and put up with unskilled
players on the way so I mostly play the US servers with a high
ping... not ideal but still playable up to 220 ping. I
was puzzled to find that I had very different stats playing the
same tanks with the same set up, which added to my suspicion
that players receive tanks with randomly slight different
parameters. This would not only explain the stats disparity between
2 same tanks, but also the stats disparity between different tanks
as in, why do I have high stats and low stats tanks? I
get that one can play better in some tank types than others,
but there are tanks I don't even like that I keep simply because I
have higher stats in them, while I have horrendous stats in tanks I
really like. Also, why is it that most often when I get a new
tank I achieve high stats (60+% win rate) until about 75
battles, then drop to around 50% over the next 30 or so
battles? My game play isn't different and I can see that
battles become increasingly more difficult (low tier vs high tier
battles, low win chance vs high win chance battles, etc..) but
something has always been nagging me that WoT could simply have a
backend system that automatically modifies tank
parameters slightly on receiving the tank and also based on other
parameters, like time, number of battles in the tank, win
rate, etc. . Have you ever found that a tank suddenly seems
to bounce shots more frequently than usual and then, a couple weeks
later, it's back to "normal"? We all know about RNG... but
what if that was this? That RNG is a backend parameter
modifier, there to always alter tanks to prevent
some from dominating the field (except when the system chooses
to do so for sales purpose). Ultimately, the question is, how
much is a player in control of their tank (skills) versus being
subject to soft manipulation by a system that, per the developers
themselves, is meant to bring players to about 50% win
rate. Of course I expect the very high stats players to
call bull. And likewise, I am exceptionally suspicious
of very high stats players, those with 30k+ battles and win rates
in excess of 70% regardless of the tank they're in.
Platooning with other high stats players will certainly affect
stats quality as win chance increases, and always platooning with
other very high stats players would help raise one's stats
too. But there are peripheral tanks in the game that
contribute to a victory but rarely are the reason for them, like
scouts and artilleries. How can very high stats players have
a 70% win rate in either of those in random pub games?
Something isn't quite right to me. I don't want to disparage
very high stats players (I often watch them play in pub matches
once I'm dead, to learn from them) but I'm suspicious that some
players either cheat and/or, more likely, have figured out how to
beat the system.
Link on message: #12863449

DeviouslyCursed: Thank you for perfectly demonstrating why I hate people.
Subject: Can someone 'splain this?
Link on message: #12863446
UncyCreepy, on Jun 29 2021 - 13:21, said: All I hear from the fanboys is "This game is TOTALLY random" MM and
RNG are random. Play better they say. Blah blah. My question is
however....You ever start a game and can't pen a tank even when
it's green and then miss perfectly aimed shots? Also notice that
you usually lose that game? Other games you fire at random and hit
tanks across the map and pen them? Those games you usually win. I
know...Random.....But how? if all was fair and good you would have
a 50% winrate randomly. I personally imho think it's rigged. Post
on the forums or say something negative and get ready for random
losses up the ying yang. I am playing other games now because this
game is randomly driving me nuts. I'll be back when those WG
randomizers get their act together. Hope it's soon, but I'm not
holding my breath.
Link on message: #12863446

DeviouslyCursed: Translation: I'm stupid and that's why I don't like
WoT! That's why WoT wasn't as popular in NA as it was anyplace
else: You have to be smarter than a box of rocks to appreciate it.
Subject: Warp103 lets talk ♦ SPG's are DEAD! RIP long live SPGs ♦ Cheers Claus
Link on message: #12863444
Altwar, on Jun 29 2021 - 13:37, said: Because I want to. Because a statement that uses a perceived
amount of the player community as its basis is no statement at all
and I am pointing that out. Nice try on tacking this
on as if it were part of what I was saying. It wasn't; that
was you.
Link on message: #12863444

Draschel: Perceived community? What kind of perceptions, useful or not?
A perception, held by a community, can be as dumb as the world is
flat as a pancake, or drilling a hole in your skull for a
migraine. Because you want to? Do you go to a
babysitter, for your taxes? Or an accountant. Did you go to a
cracked windshield replacement shop, for dental issues? How about
this, Kal Tire for an annual physicians physical, I am not
saying people, who play very well are professionals. Whether they
are or not, who knows. But what they are, are capable, accountable,
and professionals according to THIS GAME, and hold themselves
up high, to high standards. Much more so, than the people who
don't. That speaks for itself, in its own right, and if results
back up their claims while the results of the contrary don't show
any sort of back up, the decision is easy to make. Nice try.
But only an imbecile tries to get help in algebra from someone who
averages 51% in mathematics. You think there is any benefit from
the person seeking help, stuck at 45%? No, you go to a math
instructor, or tutor, that will show you AGREEABLE CREDENTIAL and
RESULTS, as to why they tutor, and have had success doing
so Do you live in the 1600s?
TeriyakiTanker
What types of accounts got Preferent Match Making? What types of accounts got...
30.06.2021 06:53:07
Subject: What types of accounts got Preferent Match Making? What types of accounts got...
Link on message: #12863429
Link on message: #12863429
TeriyakiTanker: Son, you have a 44% win rate and average 200 dmg per game you are
literally in the bottom 5% of players. You are indeed one of
the worst players on this server. Those are just
facts. Now to how you want to play the game, which is fine.
I myself have researched every tank in the game. News
flash though you will get there significantly faster if you get
better. The more you win the more experience and silver you
get. This more you contribute, ie damage, assistance, kills,
and spots the more exp and silver you will get. Not sure what
you don’t understand about that but if you stay terrible you are in
for a long and painful grind. But again you have a decision to
make and that’s on you.
TeriyakiTanker
What types of accounts got Preferent Match Making? What types of accounts got...
30.06.2021 06:29:15
Subject: What types of accounts got Preferent Match Making? What types of accounts got...
Link on message: #12863412
Piano_Puppy, on Jun 29 2021 - 22:21, said: TeriyakiTanker: talk like a boss. You don't know what I like, what
I want when play WOT,but you talk
like.... "assume"... peace out. Topic closed!!!!
Link on message: #12863412

TeriyakiTanker:
Like I said you have a choice to make about how you want to spend your time with this game, it’s up to you.
Like I said you have a choice to make about how you want to spend your time with this game, it’s up to you.
Jaguarz
What types of accounts got Preferent Match Making? What types of accounts got...
30.06.2021 06:20:16
Subject: What types of accounts got Preferent Match Making? What types of accounts got...
Link on message: #12863398
Link on message: #12863398
Jaguarz: My account gets unfair matchmaking, everyone else gets awesome
matchmaking designed specifically by wargaming to screw me over
personally, damn them!!!!
Subject: Remove Stun Requirements in Personal Missions.
Link on message: #12863353
Link on message: #12863353
DeviouslyCursed: Seriously, there's no point and even attempting them.
Subject: KV2R
Link on message: #12863243
Whistling_Death_, on Jun 30 2021 - 00:09, said:
It matters not if the nerf was specific or for all tanks. The bottom line is the performance characteristics of all Premium tanks firing HE rounds have now been adversely effected. This is something they promised the consumer/customer they would not do. No, this is wrong anyway we cut.
Link on message: #12863243

It matters not if the nerf was specific or for all tanks. The bottom line is the performance characteristics of all Premium tanks firing HE rounds have now been adversely effected. This is something they promised the consumer/customer they would not do. No, this is wrong anyway we cut.
Draschel: The way you say it, EVERYTHING is a nerf. Why then,
talk only about it now? -WG changes +4/-4 MM: "oh
my goodness, my premium tanks were nerfed! now I can no
longer deal damage to enemies 4 tiers higher than me, getting
better experience for it"-WG changes +3/-3 MM: "Dude, WG,
what the heck? Now I can't even shoot at tanks 3 tiers up? Why are
you taking away my faster queue time, and experience from damaging
very high tier tanks???"-WG changes +2/-2 MM for low tiers. See
above.-WG changes cliffs with physics models, tanks can now slide
down banks: "WG, what the heck? Why you nerf my premium tanks? I
can now fall off bridges and explode, or slide off cliffs. Dude,
you nerfed all my paid for tanks, I can now drown and turn upside
down and time out!"-WG changes physics to remove climbing attempts
to map locations, adds slippery rock making traverse difficult.
"WG, why are you nerfing all my fast, premiums?"-WG reduces HE
damage over distance, lessens inner module damage on HE splash
hits, buffs spall liner.: "WG what the heck, you are nerfing
all my tanks that shoot ammo, that I've paid for!"-WG nerfs tier 7
tanks, because tiers 5-6 get substantial HP increase and ammo
storage, tier 7 is excluded.: "WG, what the heck, why stop at tier
6? What about my tier 7s I bought!" The point is clear,
you put personal biased spin on everything done, in WGs history. To
which EVERYTHING, turns out to be a nerf, as seen by you. This is
weak man. You live a fantasy.
Subject: Add the Churchill AVRE
Link on message: #12863223
Link on message: #12863223
Draschel: Just make Churchill game carrier be able to fit the
petard M48A should be able to fit the 165mm
petard Brummbar would be fine as a premium tier 5 TD with
Bisons gunLikewise, Hetzer modification with Bisons gun a premium
tier 4 TD
Subject: Verizon gift bag
Link on message: #12863144
Link on message: #12863144
TeriyakiTanker: Thanks for the heads up, even got gold value for already having the
T78. Not bad for already having verizon.
Subject: New intuition broken on autoloaders
Link on message: #12862836
Waarheid, on Jun 29 2021 - 07:39, said:
Only if more than one loader has the skill. That is to prevent stacking the skill to above 100%.
Link on message: #12862836

Only if more than one loader has the skill. That is to prevent stacking the skill to above 100%.
churchill50: Incorrect. Intuition is averaged across all crew members who
can train the skill, just like Repairs/Camo/Firefighting.
Subject: manual fire extinguisher question
Link on message: #12862725
dunniteowl, on Jun 27 2021 - 15:34, said: Are your keys worn or sticky?
Link on message: #12862725

DeviouslyCursed: eww....
Subject: Let's bring on the paranoia
Link on message: #12862688
Stinger63, on Jun 28 2021 - 23:59, said: Because I have moved, I've had to create accounts on other servers
to keep my ping manageable. Ultimately, I simply couldn't
bare to rebuild hangars full of tanks and put up with unskilled
players on the way so I mostly play the US servers with a high
ping... not ideal but still playable up to 220 ping. I
was puzzled to find that I had very different stats playing the
same tanks with the same set up, which added to my suspicion
that players receive tanks with randomly slight different
parameters. This would not only explain the stats disparity between
2 same tanks, but also the stats disparity between different tanks
as in, why do I have high stats and low stats tanks? I
get that one can play better in some tank types than others,
but there are tanks I don't even like that I keep simply because I
have higher stats in them, while I have horrendous stats in tanks I
really like. Also, why is it that most often when I get a new
tank I achieve high stats (60+% win rate) until about 75
battles, then drop to around 50% over the next 30 or so
battles? My game play isn't different and I can see that
battles become increasingly more difficult (low tier vs high tier
battles, low win chance vs high win chance battles, etc..) but
something has always been nagging me that WoT could simply have a
backend system that automatically modifies tank
parameters slightly on receiving the tank and also based on other
parameters, like time, number of battles in the tank, win
rate, etc. . Have you ever found that a tank suddenly seems
to bounce shots more frequently than usual and then, a couple weeks
later, it's back to "normal"? We all know about RNG... but
what if that was this? That RNG is a backend parameter
modifier, there to always alter tanks to prevent
some from dominating the field (except when the system chooses
to do so for sales purpose). Ultimately, the question is, how
much is a player in control of their tank (skills) versus being
subject to soft manipulation by a system that, per the developers
themselves, is meant to bring players to about 50% win
rate. Of course I expect the very high stats players to
call bull. And likewise, I am exceptionally suspicious
of very high stats players, those with 30k+ battles and win rates
in excess of 70% regardless of the tank they're in.
Platooning with other high stats players will certainly affect
stats quality as win chance increases, and always platooning with
other very high stats players would help raise one's stats
too. But there are peripheral tanks in the game that
contribute to a victory but rarely are the reason for them, like
scouts and artilleries. How can very high stats players have
a 70% win rate in either of those in random pub games?
Something isn't quite right to me. I don't want to disparage
very high stats players (I often watch them play in pub matches
once I'm dead, to learn from them) but I'm suspicious that some
players either cheat and/or, more likely, have figured out how to
beat the system.
Link on message: #12862688

TeriyakiTanker: You should really dial back the paranoia. And frankly yes 3
good players platooning can get seriously high win rates. So
I suppose people who mostly platoon with good players have
certainly figured out how to “beat” the system, though it seems
rather obvious doesn’t it? It shouldn’t take too much brain
power to figure out that two guaranteed good teammates that you can
coordinate with are going to be much better for your chance to win
than two random players you can’t communicate with.
Subject: Changes to big caliber tanks.. time to sell
Link on message: #12862608
Suicidal_Enemy, on Jun 28 2021 - 14:39, said: It's people like you that ruin it for everyone else,
always someone crying.....
Link on message: #12862608

Draschel: its people like you, that ruin the entire playability of the
game. People like me want what is fair.Actually, I know for
certain, with 4,500 battles in Luch alone, farming tier IV? Don't
tell me what ruin is. You define it.Cry all you want concerning
1.13. What is done is done, it is a far more pleasant, fair
game now.
Subject: Warp103 lets talk ♦ SPG's are DEAD! RIP long live SPGs ♦ Cheers Claus
Link on message: #12862603
Altwar, on Jun 29 2021 - 04:18, said: Point you are making is the same one I made.
Link on message: #12862603

Draschel: Then why bring it up? If the whole point of the complaints
over artillery and HE nerfs are baseless to begin with.
Subject: Uninstalled
Link on message: #12862602
ILLR, on Jun 29 2021 - 02:15, said: I uninstalled today.
Link on message: #12862602

Draschel: You did an incomplete uninstall bub.You forgot to add and
click [♦] uninstall forum componentIf you uninstalled and don't
play the game, you certainly don't need to play the forums
Subject: Uninstalled
Link on message: #12862500
ILLR, on Jun 29 2021 - 02:15, said: Win Rate has dropped to 48.74 from 49.87.
Link on message: #12862500

DeviouslyCursed: Considering there was always another "now useless arty"
opposite you, how did your win rate drop? Maybe there's more
going on than you think (hint: there usually is) and you are
personally responsible for your new level of failure.
Subject: Warp103 lets talk ♦ SPG's are DEAD! RIP long live SPGs ♦ Cheers Claus
Link on message: #12862446
KaiserWilhelmShatner, on Jun 29 2021 - 00:31, said: The typical purple player line. No one saw that
coming.
Link on message: #12862446

Draschel: It has your best interests at heart. Even if you don't
agree, he doesn't benefit from it, you do. Why don't you try
it? What have you got to lose
Subject: Warp103 lets talk ♦ SPG's are DEAD! RIP long live SPGs ♦ Cheers Claus
Link on message: #12862335
Altwar, on Jun 28 2021 - 23:58, said: By what means do you know that "most arty players would be
fine with that"? Do you have the data from a credible survey?
Or is this just the usual empty statement made from a player whose
friend's list kind of agrees with them as a sort of communial
grousing, leading to a false perception of knowing what any
fraction of the community thinks.
Link on message: #12862335

Draschel: Point taken. Can you explain something though: When
people crying about artillery changes, HE changes Patch
1.13.....when the vast majority of average players say ''no one
asked for these changes why nerf this, why nerf that______''What
and who do they mean when they say that? Do they have data from a
credible survey? Did they scurry along and tally some population
for answers? Or is it just an empty statement out of anger agreeing
with others, like them. Leading to some false perception of
thinking to know what the community wants, or asks about /
for?
Subject: who wants a refund
Link on message: #12862323
ExploratorOne, on Jun 28 2021 - 22:58, said: I was in more than one situation this weekend where my Tier 6
was helpless with AP against certain tier 8 HTs. Even in the
side/rear. Consistent HE damage is irrelevant if it is only
12 or 15 HP. I think the numbers will clearly show the issue.
Link on message: #12862323

Draschel: What was the tier 6 tank used? What bore gun? What was
the tier 8 heavy?Chances are even patch 1.12, if you were firing
small bore size HE at a tier 8 heavy you'd be doing piss poor
damage anyway. If any damage a t a ll. This problem you are
encountering, isn't an ammo problem. Its a positioning
problem.
Subject: Warp103 lets talk ♦ SPG's are DEAD! RIP long live SPGs ♦ Cheers Claus
Link on message: #12862310
KaiserWilhelmShatner, on Jun 28 2021 - 23:29, said: RNG and that massive inbound warning plays no affect.
"play better"
Link on message: #12862310

Draschel: But you aren't providing fact, which are essentially baseless
claim. See how that works? Okay, M44 aim time and ROF was
nerfed. Firstly, lets get that out of the way. So, you can be
a tad more inaccurate with M44, because of worse off
aim-time. But......dispersion stats, accuracy has not
been changed. Arty isn't missing anymore than they used to.Let's
assume, that a competent player will land 40-45% accuracy with an
artillery. That's fair to say, right? Are you doing that? If
not, playing better has some merit. Saying arty miss, with no
support to the claim has no merit
Subject: Obj 279 (e) is an absolute monster now
Link on message: #12862298
xXxBaba_YagaxXx, on Jun 28 2021 - 23:25, said: I don't hate them because they play better, I hate them because
they are all a bunch of cryers who want everything nerf for their
own benefits.
Link on message: #12862298

Draschel: i find it very funny, you say good players cry for a nerf.
And bad players respond by crying because of a nerf. And you say,
stop crying. And how exactly, do you figure that it is only
good players that WG listens to only? I doubt it, have any
proof?
Subject: E50M as assault medium?
Link on message: #12862260
Link on message: #12862260
Draschel: Just for comparison, a '-meh-' camo medium, like
Centurion AX has the least possible camo I'd want to drive into
battle with, and thats somewhere near 27.00Assuming a standard,
average player setup of vents purge, ventilation in +% spot, 100%,
BIA, consumable, paintingAn E50M in comparison, has around
22.75. A dumb heavy tank like Defender, can surprise you with
nearly 18.00 A sniper schnitzel Leopard PTA can pretty
standard, acquire 32.00 camo. Remember all these figures are
without bush. See the difference? I can't see a reason to
drive E50M unless you are some crazed maniac at the wheel thinking
your playing virtual bumper cars. Its just a bad 277, 260,
113
Subject: Ranked Battles Season X Feedback Request
Link on message: #12862256
Link on message: #12862256
DomoSapien: Quick reminder, Ranked Battles Season X is going live today, please
feel free to share your impressions once y'all have a chance to try
out the changes!
Реклама | Adv