Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: KASIMDA ASKER?
Link on message: #6261472
Ganyotcu, on 22 October 2013 - 12:34 PM, said: Tşk kejjak senin ne zamandı?
Link on message: #6261472
Ganyotcu, on 22 October 2013 - 12:34 PM, said: Tşk kejjak senin ne zamandı?Kejjak: Ah benim askerliğim ertelenmiş durumda uzun bir süre, sırayla
biliyorsun :) Zaten bütün geyikleri öğrendik gitmeden. Yani BEN Mİ
YAPAYIM
burdan
şimdi 
Subject: skandal z promocją na złoto za SMS w WoT - SONDA weź udział
Link on message: #6261458
Link on message: #6261458
Cmd_Latina: Promocja, o której mowa w tym wątku jest pierwszą oferowaną przez
nas tego typu ofertą. Dzięki współpracy z partnerem biznesowym
udało nam się wynegocjować specjalny przelicznik dla klientów
T-Mobile.
Zakupując jeden z pakietów oferowanych tylko dla klientów T-Mobile za każdą sztabkę złota gracze zapłacili 40% mniej, porównując do przelicznika standardowych, od zawsze oferowanych przez nas pakietów możliwych do zakupu za pomocą opcji SMS.
Zapoznaliśmy się ze zgłoszeniami graczy i jesteśmy świadomi, że opis oferty na stronie był mało szczegółowy, co mogło prowadzić do nieporozumienia. Tak, jak napisałam powyżej jest to pierwsza tego typu oferta i z pewnością wszelkie sugestie oraz uwagi zostaną przez nas wzięte pod uwagę przy okazji przyszłych promocji tego typu.
Zakupując jeden z pakietów oferowanych tylko dla klientów T-Mobile za każdą sztabkę złota gracze zapłacili 40% mniej, porównując do przelicznika standardowych, od zawsze oferowanych przez nas pakietów możliwych do zakupu za pomocą opcji SMS.
Zapoznaliśmy się ze zgłoszeniami graczy i jesteśmy świadomi, że opis oferty na stronie był mało szczegółowy, co mogło prowadzić do nieporozumienia. Tak, jak napisałam powyżej jest to pierwsza tego typu oferta i z pewnością wszelkie sugestie oraz uwagi zostaną przez nas wzięte pod uwagę przy okazji przyszłych promocji tego typu.
Subject: Manœuvres d’anniversaire – Les gagnants des chars moyens
Link on message: #6261248
Kaiwr, on 23 October 2013 - 05:43 AM, said: Donc j'aimerai faire remonter l'info à WG.
Et comme dit dans mon précédent post, j'ai le replay à l'appui.
Link on message: #6261248
Kaiwr, on 23 October 2013 - 05:43 AM, said: Donc j'aimerai faire remonter l'info à WG.Et comme dit dans mon précédent post, j'ai le replay à l'appui.
Tanatoy: Envoie un ticket au support en leur
expliquant la situation, avec la date exacte si possible et
n'oublie pas de joindre le replay !
Subject: Tiger 1 Mid Academy (1387) 1/35 +Big ED Eduard (3516)
Link on message: #6261000
Link on message: #6261000
Tanatoy: Alors là..Je n'ai plus qu'à te dire : Bon courage ! Et puis, je
serai bien heureux de voir les résultats quand ce sera fini !
Tanatoy
Impossible de créer un ticket pour insulte : merci WG pour cette mise à jour
23.10.2013 13:24:49
Subject: Impossible de créer un ticket pour insulte : merci WG pour cette mise à jour
Link on message: #6260960
J45_MaSdeS, on 23 October 2013 - 09:52 AM, said: Déjà que vous ne savez pas faire la différence entre un pseudo
créer avec de l'imagination et un representant de cette nostalgie,
je doute que vous sachiez faire la différence entre 2 insultes.
Je parle même pas de la censure forum qui s'est dit "tien reta-rd c'est une insulte en anglais donc on le bloque" sans prendre 2 seconde pour verifier que ce mot n'a pas un signification dans un autre langue
Link on message: #6260960
J45_MaSdeS, on 23 October 2013 - 09:52 AM, said: Déjà que vous ne savez pas faire la différence entre un pseudo
créer avec de l'imagination et un representant de cette nostalgie,
je doute que vous sachiez faire la différence entre 2 insultes.Je parle même pas de la censure forum qui s'est dit "tien reta-rd c'est une insulte en anglais donc on le bloque" sans prendre 2 seconde pour verifier que ce mot n'a pas un signification dans un autre langue
Tanatoy: Malheureusement, les représentants de cette nostalgie ont aussi
(quelque fois) de l'imagination... Donc la règle est la même pour
tout le monde. Et la France est un des rares pays à utiliser des
numéros pour leurs départements.
Le filtre anti-grossièretés sur le forum a effectivement un souci, celui du mot re-tard. Un souci. Et que pour les francophones. Et ce mot est plus utilisé sur le forum pour la définition anglaise que pour la française. Et comme je l'avais dit autre part, j'ai attirer l'attention des administrateurs à ce sujet.
Le filtre anti-grossièretés sur le forum a effectivement un souci, celui du mot re-tard. Un souci. Et que pour les francophones. Et ce mot est plus utilisé sur le forum pour la définition anglaise que pour la française. Et comme je l'avais dit autre part, j'ai attirer l'attention des administrateurs à ce sujet.
Subject: Playing Ducks Introduction
Link on message: #6260587
Link on message: #6260587
Berbo: Their official mascot could be, see the spoiler

GL Playing Ducks!

GL Playing Ducks!
Subject: Neue Clankriegkampagne steht bevor!
Link on message: #6260487
AtomPilot, on 23 October 2013 - 08:06 AM, said: das glaube ich eher nicht. Jeder WGler hat ja auch nen eigenen
Account und da denke ich mal, dass der benutzt wird. Ausserdem
würde ich PanzerGert und Konsorten nicht so einschätzen, dass die
sich für sowas künstlich pushen müssten 
Link on message: #6260487
AtomPilot, on 23 October 2013 - 08:06 AM, said: das glaube ich eher nicht. Jeder WGler hat ja auch nen eigenen
Account und da denke ich mal, dass der benutzt wird. Ausserdem
würde ich PanzerGert und Konsorten nicht so einschätzen, dass die
sich für sowas künstlich pushen müssten Obirian: Wir spielen mit unseren ganz normalen Accounts. Da ist kein Fake
oder ähnliches. Mein Account besteht seit 2010 und ich habe mir
damals sogar noch den Löwen usw selber gekauft. Sprich
stinknormaler Account mit stinknormalen Stats.
Gruß,
Obirian
Gruß,
Obirian
Subject: New Campaign coming soon!
Link on message: #6260451
Mak0r, on 23 October 2013 - 09:56 AM, said: Ok. After these answers we are 100% sure you have no idea what you
do. Typical WG.
1. Hows that?! In real battles you must win by cap sometimes or enemy suicides. In staged, fake bettles you can stage that only one tank with 1hp will survive and you can cap and decap for 14 minutes so you are able to farm maximal xp values.
2.
Really? You, the same person, say opposite things about the same situation. Decide!
A."Only players, that participate in the battle get FP."
B."every Team member will get the same amount of fame points. The overall base XP will be divided though the team."
Check word "logic" in dictionary please because there is no logic in your answers.
Gratz WG. Another fail. We should start using wg as synonym to fail. F.e.: I've wged hard vs. Tom's Guys yesterday.
Link on message: #6260451
Mak0r, on 23 October 2013 - 09:56 AM, said: Ok. After these answers we are 100% sure you have no idea what you
do. Typical WG.1. Hows that?! In real battles you must win by cap sometimes or enemy suicides. In staged, fake bettles you can stage that only one tank with 1hp will survive and you can cap and decap for 14 minutes so you are able to farm maximal xp values.
2.
Really? You, the same person, say opposite things about the same situation. Decide!
A."Only players, that participate in the battle get FP."
B."every Team member will get the same amount of fame points. The overall base XP will be divided though the team."
Check word "logic" in dictionary please because there is no logic in your answers.
Gratz WG. Another fail. We should start using wg as synonym to fail. F.e.: I've wged hard vs. Tom's Guys yesterday.
Obirian: Yes, a group of players fighting a battle is called a team. So I
don't see any logic issue here. If you are in a clan but don't do
any battles at all you won't get any FP. So only active players in
the clan who are fighting in battles get FP.
Also the whole system about the campaign 2 is build in a way that clans need to be active to earn enough points.
Later in the day we will announce more details, so please stay tuned.
Cheers,
Obirian
Also the whole system about the campaign 2 is build in a way that clans need to be active to earn enough points.
Later in the day we will announce more details, so please stay tuned.
Cheers,
Obirian
Subject: Připravte se na nové tažení klanových válek!
Link on message: #6260447
Link on message: #6260447
Tuccy: Budete mít možnost ztrestat mne 
Subject: [Événement en jeu] La dernière bataille...
Link on message: #6260153
Link on message: #6260153
Tanatoy: Merci Fimbul ! Normalement, vous devriez tous avoir reçu l'or ce
matin 
Tanatoy
Impossible de créer un ticket pour insulte : merci WG pour cette mise à jour
23.10.2013 11:40:11
Subject: Impossible de créer un ticket pour insulte : merci WG pour cette mise à jour
Link on message: #6260052
Link on message: #6260052
Tanatoy: Et comme les sanctions sont doublés si elles sont récurrentes, ils
se retrouveront à la fin banni du tchat définitivement. Et pour les
infractions en jeu (poussage/bloquage), ils se retrouvent bannie du
jeu, et non du tchat.
Subject: Tiger 1 Mid Academy (1387) 1/35 +Big ED Eduard (3516)
Link on message: #6260028
Link on message: #6260028
Tanatoy: Juste pour info, combien de pièces le kit academy (j'ai toujours
était agréablement surpris par leur qualité) et le kit de
photo-découpe Eduard (qui eux, font aussi des produits superbes) ?
Je sens bien le 400 voire plus..
Subject: New Campaign coming soon!
Link on message: #6259985
Kantti, on 23 October 2013 - 09:02 AM, said: This simply doesn't hold true as in friendlies exp per battle is
easily manipulated. I have seen some experimental results in CW
battles (during last campaign when people didn't have anything more
meaningfull to do while farming) where a guy with one fcm50 got
around 15k exp from a match when he shot 15 50Bs. If one wants to
go even further extremities, they'll take bunch of t1 cunninghams
and shoot batchats gaining horrible amounts of experience for each
t1. You don't have to do that for many evening to guarantee tanks
for couple of clans... And it is much more secure way of doing it
than risking engagements between quality clans where losing side
won't get almost any Fame Points and thus risks everything. I'll
tell you that you'll see even more absurd alliances this time than
in last campaign and these alliances will be farming fame points in
so silly ways that it does make me cry. Instead of cool fighting we
will see rules exploiting of worst sort. Thank you for bringing us
ruleset that does encourage for that.
Link on message: #6259985
Kantti, on 23 October 2013 - 09:02 AM, said: This simply doesn't hold true as in friendlies exp per battle is
easily manipulated. I have seen some experimental results in CW
battles (during last campaign when people didn't have anything more
meaningfull to do while farming) where a guy with one fcm50 got
around 15k exp from a match when he shot 15 50Bs. If one wants to
go even further extremities, they'll take bunch of t1 cunninghams
and shoot batchats gaining horrible amounts of experience for each
t1. You don't have to do that for many evening to guarantee tanks
for couple of clans... And it is much more secure way of doing it
than risking engagements between quality clans where losing side
won't get almost any Fame Points and thus risks everything. I'll
tell you that you'll see even more absurd alliances this time than
in last campaign and these alliances will be farming fame points in
so silly ways that it does make me cry. Instead of cool fighting we
will see rules exploiting of worst sort. Thank you for bringing us
ruleset that does encourage for that.Obirian:
Unfortunately there are always weak spots in any system and we will never be able to avoid to a 100%. But if we identify nonathletic behavior we will take action and I can assure you that no Clan War tank will be rewarded to this clans. We will even remove it after the campaign ended if we find out such behavior.
Cheers,
Obirian
Unfortunately there are always weak spots in any system and we will never be able to avoid to a 100%. But if we identify nonathletic behavior we will take action and I can assure you that no Clan War tank will be rewarded to this clans. We will even remove it after the campaign ended if we find out such behavior.
Cheers,
Obirian
Subject: Discussion et reflexions historiques
Link on message: #6259846
KuroNyra, on 22 October 2013 - 11:34 PM, said: Quelle étaient les chasseurs les plus redoutables dans les
turnfights, et aussi grosso modo, les grandes séries d'avions de
l'époques.
Link on message: #6259846
KuroNyra, on 22 October 2013 - 11:34 PM, said: Quelle étaient les chasseurs les plus redoutables dans les
turnfights, et aussi grosso modo, les grandes séries d'avions de
l'époques.Tanatoy:
L'industrie aéronautique pendant la 1ere GM a était aussi florissante que lors de la première. Alors, les grandes séries d'avions, c'est vaste ! Du côté français, les Spad, Nieuport, Bréguet pour l'observation-bombardement. Chez les italiens, Caproni commencèrent leur début à cette époque. Chez les anglais, Vickers et Avro pour les bombardiers, et plus Sopwith pour les chasseurs. Un certain Sikorsky commenca à produire des avions en Russie...
Côté Entente, là, un peu tous les noms connus (Dornier, Albatros, Aviatik, les Gotha de bombardement) à part Messerchmitt et Focke-Wulf commencèrent à produire des avions, avec surtout la collaboration d'un Néerlandais dénommé Fokker.
Les plus redoutables dans un dogfight ? Mmmh, un peu comme pendant la seconde guerre mondiale, cela changeait tous les 6 mois ! Une domination d'un camp en remplaçait une autre, jusqu'à que de meilleures moteurs, mitrailleuses mieux synchronisés soient mises en lignes dans les unités.
L'industrie aéronautique pendant la 1ere GM a était aussi florissante que lors de la première. Alors, les grandes séries d'avions, c'est vaste ! Du côté français, les Spad, Nieuport, Bréguet pour l'observation-bombardement. Chez les italiens, Caproni commencèrent leur début à cette époque. Chez les anglais, Vickers et Avro pour les bombardiers, et plus Sopwith pour les chasseurs. Un certain Sikorsky commenca à produire des avions en Russie...
Côté Entente, là, un peu tous les noms connus (Dornier, Albatros, Aviatik, les Gotha de bombardement) à part Messerchmitt et Focke-Wulf commencèrent à produire des avions, avec surtout la collaboration d'un Néerlandais dénommé Fokker.
Les plus redoutables dans un dogfight ? Mmmh, un peu comme pendant la seconde guerre mondiale, cela changeait tous les 6 mois ! Une domination d'un camp en remplaçait une autre, jusqu'à que de meilleures moteurs, mitrailleuses mieux synchronisés soient mises en lignes dans les unités.
Subject: New Campaign coming soon!
Link on message: #6259765
superbabs84321eu, on 22 October 2013 - 05:04 PM, said: Dear Obiron,
I have several questions:
Is it the inteition of WG to grant these VK 72.01 to the players of the most skilled clans? Because the way I read the campaign it should be rather easy to gain massive amounts of fame points with a questonable amount skill. After all, an average clan winning massively from a poor clan can get just as much xp (or even more) than a good clan winning barely from another good clan.
Here are some of additional assesment, which I would love to get a reply to.
1. If fame points are xp based, then how will you counteract that clans will just stage (fake) fights to get as much xp as possible (and taking turns)
2. What advantage does it have to have 100 active clan members over, say 15 (and 85 passive)? Both clans have 100 chips and can play up to 6 15-team battles. However, each player from the 100 active clan can play only about 1 match per day, while each player from the 15 active clan could play up to 6 matches per day. It seems that for the latter clan it would be much easier to gain xp and thus, fame points.
Babs out!
Link on message: #6259765
superbabs84321eu, on 22 October 2013 - 05:04 PM, said: Dear Obiron,I have several questions:
Is it the inteition of WG to grant these VK 72.01 to the players of the most skilled clans? Because the way I read the campaign it should be rather easy to gain massive amounts of fame points with a questonable amount skill. After all, an average clan winning massively from a poor clan can get just as much xp (or even more) than a good clan winning barely from another good clan.
Here are some of additional assesment, which I would love to get a reply to.
1. If fame points are xp based, then how will you counteract that clans will just stage (fake) fights to get as much xp as possible (and taking turns)
2. What advantage does it have to have 100 active clan members over, say 15 (and 85 passive)? Both clans have 100 chips and can play up to 6 15-team battles. However, each player from the 100 active clan can play only about 1 match per day, while each player from the 15 active clan could play up to 6 matches per day. It seems that for the latter clan it would be much easier to gain xp and thus, fame points.
Babs out!
Obirian:
Morning!
1. If Clans stage fake fights, they will not get large clean XP per battle => they will not get many FP.
2. Only players, that participate in the battle get FP. If there are only 15 players from the Clan participate in battles, only 15 players will get FP.
Cheers,
Obirian
Morning!
1. If Clans stage fake fights, they will not get large clean XP per battle => they will not get many FP.
2. Only players, that participate in the battle get FP. If there are only 15 players from the Clan participate in battles, only 15 players will get FP.
Cheers,
Obirian
Subject: Second Campaign Announced
Link on message: #6259764
Coldius, on 23 October 2013 - 12:12 AM, said: So if I have red everything correctly so far.
Stage 1 will be upto tier 6 tanks ( basically 15v15 all tier 6 )
Stage 2 will be upto tier 8 tanks ( basically 15v15 all tier 8 )
Stage 3 will be upto tier 10 tanks ( basically 15v15 all tier 10 )
If this is correct; could someone verify.
X_CND_X, on 23 October 2013 - 08:04 AM, said: I am just asking to clarify and be sure. Will we able to use light
tanks such as 59-16 or AMX 12t etc in stage one ? or in
other words, will there be a limitation rules that is
applied for the light T6 tanks in medium companies ?
Link on message: #6259764
Coldius, on 23 October 2013 - 12:12 AM, said: So if I have red everything correctly so far.Stage 1 will be upto tier 6 tanks ( basically 15v15 all tier 6 )
Stage 2 will be upto tier 8 tanks ( basically 15v15 all tier 8 )
Stage 3 will be upto tier 10 tanks ( basically 15v15 all tier 10 )
If this is correct; could someone verify.
Decept1on: Correct, no limit.
X_CND_X, on 23 October 2013 - 08:04 AM, said: I am just asking to clarify and be sure. Will we able to use light
tanks such as 59-16 or AMX 12t etc in stage one ? or in
other words, will there be a limitation rules that is
applied for the light T6 tanks in medium companies ?Decept1on:
Tanatoy
Impossible de créer un ticket pour insulte : merci WG pour cette mise à jour
23.10.2013 09:27:47
Subject: Impossible de créer un ticket pour insulte : merci WG pour cette mise à jour
Link on message: #6259249
Gardavoufix, on 23 October 2013 - 06:43 AM, said: J'ai quand même quelques questions :
Quand on constate que pour des insultes à caractère raciste, homophobe, ou qui induisent des menaces physiques, le(s) joueur(s) incriminés sont toujours sur le jeu après "traitement" d'un ticket "ancien modèle", que penser des sanctions avec ce nouveau système qui ne permet aucunement de connaître la gravité de l'insulte ?
Est-ce à dire, donc, que le joueur qui va se prendre des reports pour des "noobs" risque la même sanction que celui qui aura fait l'apologie de crimes de guerre ?
Parce que, sans le replay, comment WG va-t-il prendre en compte "l'importance" de l'insulte ?
Et dernière question, est-ce que les sanctions seront toujours aussi inefficaces ?
Link on message: #6259249
Gardavoufix, on 23 October 2013 - 06:43 AM, said: J'ai quand même quelques questions :Quand on constate que pour des insultes à caractère raciste, homophobe, ou qui induisent des menaces physiques, le(s) joueur(s) incriminés sont toujours sur le jeu après "traitement" d'un ticket "ancien modèle", que penser des sanctions avec ce nouveau système qui ne permet aucunement de connaître la gravité de l'insulte ?
Est-ce à dire, donc, que le joueur qui va se prendre des reports pour des "noobs" risque la même sanction que celui qui aura fait l'apologie de crimes de guerre ?
Parce que, sans le replay, comment WG va-t-il prendre en compte "l'importance" de l'insulte ?
Et dernière question, est-ce que les sanctions seront toujours aussi inefficaces ?
Tanatoy: Salut à toi Gardavoufix,
Depuis la fin de la semaine dernière, il y a effectivement eu un changement au sujet des rapports pour les violations en jeu. Nous souhaitions écrire un post à ce sujet plus complet, mais si tu as lancé le sujet, autant y répondre
.
Ce système a été choisi par rapport à l'ancien système (ndlr : ticket) car après plusieurs mois de mise en place, nous nous sommes rendus compte qu'il fonctionnait sans anicroche, et qu'avec le lancement proche de World of Warplanes, World of Warships qui grossit à l'horizon, nous nous devions de trouver un système qui fonctionne et qui sois rapide pour vous comme pour nous.
Je tiens par contre à préciser que ce système n'est pas final, nous pourrons l'améliorer en fonction de vos retours et de nos constatations.
Pour la différenciation entre le "noob" et le ....disons, nostalgique de l'Allemagne des années 40, vous pouvez être sûr qu'elle est faite, et que nous continuerons à le faire. Heureusement, ces nostalgiques sont moins nombreux que le 44% de WR qui dit noob, car il n'est pas content de s'être fait piquer "son" buisson, mais il est clair que nous ne voulons pas de ces personnes en jeu (les nostalgiques), et que les sanctions subit sont parmi les plus lourdes, ce qui est juste normal.
Nous n'avons pas besoin du replay pour savoir ce qui a été écrit en jeu, le replay nous permet juste de mieux comprendre la situation et le contexte de cette dernière.
Des sanctions inefficaces ? Personnellement, ça m’embêterait de ne pas pouvoir communiquer avec les autres joueurs pendant plusieurs dizaines d'heures.
Au sujet de ton exemple, cela me paraît bizarre, car ces joueurs ont forcément subi du tchat ban en jeu, et sûrement que pour te faire rager un peu plus, ce "commandant" t'as écrit cette réponse.
Depuis la fin de la semaine dernière, il y a effectivement eu un changement au sujet des rapports pour les violations en jeu. Nous souhaitions écrire un post à ce sujet plus complet, mais si tu as lancé le sujet, autant y répondre
Ce système a été choisi par rapport à l'ancien système (ndlr : ticket) car après plusieurs mois de mise en place, nous nous sommes rendus compte qu'il fonctionnait sans anicroche, et qu'avec le lancement proche de World of Warplanes, World of Warships qui grossit à l'horizon, nous nous devions de trouver un système qui fonctionne et qui sois rapide pour vous comme pour nous.
Je tiens par contre à préciser que ce système n'est pas final, nous pourrons l'améliorer en fonction de vos retours et de nos constatations.
Pour la différenciation entre le "noob" et le ....disons, nostalgique de l'Allemagne des années 40, vous pouvez être sûr qu'elle est faite, et que nous continuerons à le faire. Heureusement, ces nostalgiques sont moins nombreux que le 44% de WR qui dit noob, car il n'est pas content de s'être fait piquer "son" buisson, mais il est clair que nous ne voulons pas de ces personnes en jeu (les nostalgiques), et que les sanctions subit sont parmi les plus lourdes, ce qui est juste normal.
Nous n'avons pas besoin du replay pour savoir ce qui a été écrit en jeu, le replay nous permet juste de mieux comprendre la situation et le contexte de cette dernière.
Des sanctions inefficaces ? Personnellement, ça m’embêterait de ne pas pouvoir communiquer avec les autres joueurs pendant plusieurs dizaines d'heures.
Au sujet de ton exemple, cela me paraît bizarre, car ces joueurs ont forcément subi du tchat ban en jeu, et sûrement que pour te faire rager un peu plus, ce "commandant" t'as écrit cette réponse.
Subject: Uczciwość członka WG
Link on message: #6257471
Darlantan, on 22 October 2013 - 08:58 PM, said: Kanał miał nazwę "Attached thumbnails" i pojawiło się to w temacie
zabawy. Więc kto to dał??
Nie - screen nie rozwiał niczego, ani nie wyjaśnił skąd się wzięła informacja o pierwszym kanale.
Link on message: #6257471
Darlantan, on 22 October 2013 - 08:58 PM, said: Kanał miał nazwę "Attached thumbnails" i pojawiło się to w temacie
zabawy. Więc kto to dał??Nie - screen nie rozwiał niczego, ani nie wyjaśnił skąd się wzięła informacja o pierwszym kanale.
Gepard_PH: Żadnej informacji o "pierwszym kanale" nie było, nie było też
żadnego "pierwszego kanału". Posta edytowałem raz, dopisałem nazwę
kanału, podpowiedź do hasła, dodałem obrazek i tyle. A Attached
thumbnails oznacza Dołączone miniaturki i jest tekstem doklejanym
automatycznie przez forum do postów w których są obrazki...
Tajemnica wyjaśniona.
Tajemnica wyjaśniona.
Subject: Uczciwość członka WG
Link on message: #6257383
Link on message: #6257383
Gepard_PH: Nie lubię niedomówień i nieporozumień, a myślę, że ten screen
rozwieje wszelkie wątpliwości:
![]()
Swoją drogą, doceniam, że temat został nazwany "uczciwość" a nie "nieuczciwość". Przynajmniej wszystko się zgadza :)
Proszę zawsze sprawdzać przez kogo kanał został założony - jeśli nie przez kogoś z Zespołu Community to znaczy, że to nie ten kanał.
Swoją drogą, doceniam, że temat został nazwany "uczciwość" a nie "nieuczciwość". Przynajmniej wszystko się zgadza :)
Proszę zawsze sprawdzać przez kogo kanał został założony - jeśli nie przez kogoś z Zespołu Community to znaczy, że to nie ten kanał.
Subject: Uczciwość członka WG
Link on message: #6257346
Link on message: #6257346
Gepard_PH: Nazwa kanału czatu (konwoj) i zagadka z hasłem zostały podane
przeze mnie o 18.53 tam gdzie miały się pojawić, czyli w pierwszym
poście tematu o zabawie.
Nikt nie zmieniał nazwy kanału. Nie wiem w ogóle skąd taki pomysł? Cała reszta potem odbyła się normalnie - ponieważ chętnym było więcej niż miejsc, wybraliśmy 28 pierwszych osób, które zostały zaproszenia do właściwej zabawy, czyli do pokoju treningowego, gdzie rozgrywały się bitwy.
EDIT:
Po dłuższym zastanowieniu wydaje mi się, że po prostu pomyliłeś kanał czatu, na który trzeba było wejść z pokojem treningowym, do którego potem przenieśli się uczestnicy.
Nikt nie zmieniał nazwy kanału. Nie wiem w ogóle skąd taki pomysł? Cała reszta potem odbyła się normalnie - ponieważ chętnym było więcej niż miejsc, wybraliśmy 28 pierwszych osób, które zostały zaproszenia do właściwej zabawy, czyli do pokoju treningowego, gdzie rozgrywały się bitwy.
EDIT:
Po dłuższym zastanowieniu wydaje mi się, że po prostu pomyliłeś kanał czatu, na który trzeba było wejść z pokojem treningowym, do którego potem przenieśli się uczestnicy.
Subject: Konwój! (22.10.2013)
Link on message: #6257211
Link on message: #6257211
Gepard_PH: Zainteresowanie zabawą przerosło oczekiwania. Zapotrzebowanie na
wydarzenia in-game jest duże :)
Dziękuję wszystkim za przybycie, a uczestnikom za udział i zaangażowanie w zabawę. I oczywiście gratuluję nagród!
Postaram się zorganizować kolejny event jeszcze w tym tygodniu. Poprawię też nieco sposób wybierania uczestników, żeby przygotowania do właściwej zabawy szły sprawniej, bo przy tak dużej liczbie chętnych zbyt dużo czasu musieliście czekać na zaproszenia (bądź też przykrą informację, że "niestety ale mamy komplet").
Obiecane linki do powtórek:runda 1
runda 2
dogrywka
Dziękuję wszystkim za przybycie, a uczestnikom za udział i zaangażowanie w zabawę. I oczywiście gratuluję nagród!
Postaram się zorganizować kolejny event jeszcze w tym tygodniu. Poprawię też nieco sposób wybierania uczestników, żeby przygotowania do właściwej zabawy szły sprawniej, bo przy tak dużej liczbie chętnych zbyt dużo czasu musieliście czekać na zaproszenia (bądź też przykrą informację, że "niestety ale mamy komplet").
Obiecane linki do powtórek:runda 1
runda 2
dogrywka
Subject: New Campaign coming soon!
Link on message: #6256874
Bajuware, on 22 October 2013 - 07:42 PM, said: Wink, wink, Golden Joystick is coming.... let's do a little
bribery...
Link on message: #6256874
Bajuware, on 22 October 2013 - 07:42 PM, said: Wink, wink, Golden Joystick is coming.... let's do a little
bribery...Obirian: Votes are
already closed since last sunday
;)
IPaul72
I have an elite tank (everything researched) but how do i convert that exp to...
22.10.2013 21:32:06
Subject: I have an elite tank (everything researched) but how do i convert that exp to...
Link on message: #6256744
Lord_Rogers, on 22 October 2013 - 06:34 PM, said: I have an elite tank (everything researched) but how do i convert
that exp to free exp? i have tried looking at other forums but
still need help. any one know? i have 3 elite tier 1 tanks with
loads of xp.
LeMoron, on 22 October 2013 - 06:42 PM, said: You press the "Convert Experience" button in the corner.
Double ninja'd.
Link on message: #6256744
Lord_Rogers, on 22 October 2013 - 06:34 PM, said: I have an elite tank (everything researched) but how do i convert
that exp to free exp? i have tried looking at other forums but
still need help. any one know? i have 3 elite tier 1 tanks with
loads of xp.IPaul72: Hello there Lord_Rogers
Has it has been said before you can use the convert button in the corner by using in game gold.
But to be honest this excellent guide by krazypenguin can say it in a much better way
Has it has been said before you can use the convert button in the corner by using in game gold.
But to be honest this excellent guide by krazypenguin can say it in a much better way
LeMoron, on 22 October 2013 - 06:42 PM, said: You press the "Convert Experience" button in the corner.Double ninja'd.
IPaul72: I love the avatar pic it always makes me laugh when I see it and
being double ninja'd just ain't cricket! 
Kind Regards all
IPaul72
Kind Regards all
IPaul72
Subject: David protiv Golijata - Impresionizam u WOT-u
Link on message: #6256072
8OJ4N, on 22 October 2013 - 06:11 PM, said: Jel' ima neko neku zelju da vidi neki njemu omiljeni tenk oslikan u
impresionistickom stilu?
A, ti, Hunter, ako ti ikad zatreba originalan avatar evo:

Link on message: #6256072
8OJ4N, on 22 October 2013 - 06:11 PM, said: Jel' ima neko neku zelju da vidi neki njemu omiljeni tenk oslikan u
impresionistickom stilu?A, ti, Hunter, ako ti ikad zatreba originalan avatar evo:

Hunter1911: Moglo bi ići kao Skype avatar :D
Subject: David protiv Golijata - Impresionizam u WOT-u
Link on message: #6256072
8OJ4N, on 22 October 2013 - 06:11 PM, said: Jel' ima neko neku zelju da vidi neki njemu omiljeni tenk oslikan u
impresionistickom stilu?
A, ti, Hunter, ako ti ikad zatreba originalan avatar evo:

Link on message: #6256072
8OJ4N, on 22 October 2013 - 06:11 PM, said: Jel' ima neko neku zelju da vidi neki njemu omiljeni tenk oslikan u
impresionistickom stilu?A, ti, Hunter, ako ti ikad zatreba originalan avatar evo:

TheKroo: Moglo bi ići kao Skype avatar :D
Subject: David protiv Golijata - Impresionizam u WOT-u
Link on message: #6255896
8OJ4N, on 22 October 2013 - 01:11 PM, said: Evo i nesto specijalno za naseg najmilijeg moderatora:

GOSPODIN HUNTER.
8OJ4N, on 22 October 2013 - 01:19 PM, said: Mislim da sam uspio da uhvatim onaj njegov bludni pogled dok masta
o palacinkama sa evrokremom.
Link on message: #6255896
8OJ4N, on 22 October 2013 - 01:11 PM, said: Evo i nesto specijalno za naseg najmilijeg moderatora:
GOSPODIN HUNTER.
Hunter1911: Awww <3
Baš sam seksi ispao u ovom noir stilu.
Baš sam seksi ispao u ovom noir stilu.
8OJ4N, on 22 October 2013 - 01:19 PM, said: Mislim da sam uspio da uhvatim onaj njegov bludni pogled dok masta
o palacinkama sa evrokremom.Hunter1911: Sad mi se jedu palačinke, a nemam eurokrem :|


Subject: David protiv Golijata - Impresionizam u WOT-u
Link on message: #6255896
8OJ4N, on 22 October 2013 - 01:11 PM, said: Evo i nesto specijalno za naseg najmilijeg moderatora:

GOSPODIN HUNTER.
8OJ4N, on 22 October 2013 - 01:19 PM, said: Mislim da sam uspio da uhvatim onaj njegov bludni pogled dok masta
o palacinkama sa evrokremom.
Link on message: #6255896
8OJ4N, on 22 October 2013 - 01:11 PM, said: Evo i nesto specijalno za naseg najmilijeg moderatora:
GOSPODIN HUNTER.
TheKroo: Awww <3
Baš sam seksi ispao u ovom noir stilu.
Baš sam seksi ispao u ovom noir stilu.
8OJ4N, on 22 October 2013 - 01:19 PM, said: Mislim da sam uspio da uhvatim onaj njegov bludni pogled dok masta
o palacinkama sa evrokremom.TheKroo: Sad mi se jedu palačinke, a nemam eurokrem :|


Subject: Revealing Allies Positions
Link on message: #6255550
BodyGuardOfLies, on 22 October 2013 - 04:46 PM, said: Thank you Paul
Hopefully everybody will see the opportunity in this thread to discuss the plague of players who think that it is ok to reveal allied positions. iPaul73 has said "We contact the relevant people and they contact theirs then a decision is made after hearing all the arguments measuring pro and cons." so this could be a chance to suggest changes which will improve the game for everyone.
There have been many interesting points put forward and it is clear that many of you would miss the ability to talk to the enemy team either before or after the death of their tank.
There is the argument that if the ability were removed that we would have lost a valuable element of the game I personally have no interest in anything that I have heard to date from dead players on either team,
The enemy are usually barracking and our own teams more often than not are either declaring me a noob for not supporting the suicidal endeavor which resulted in their demise or earnestly handing down the sort of tip which for me became apparent 20,000 battles ago.
Furthermore I can't type, this short text has taken me the best part of 10 minutes as I have the sort of manual dexterity one would usually associate with a litre of vodka so it is impossible for me to reply to any ingame chat whilst driving which is very frustrating.
Now that this thread is back on course I look forward to hearing all your reasoned arguments.
Regards
BodyGuardOfLies
Link on message: #6255550
BodyGuardOfLies, on 22 October 2013 - 04:46 PM, said: Thank you PaulHopefully everybody will see the opportunity in this thread to discuss the plague of players who think that it is ok to reveal allied positions. iPaul73 has said "We contact the relevant people and they contact theirs then a decision is made after hearing all the arguments measuring pro and cons." so this could be a chance to suggest changes which will improve the game for everyone.
There have been many interesting points put forward and it is clear that many of you would miss the ability to talk to the enemy team either before or after the death of their tank.
There is the argument that if the ability were removed that we would have lost a valuable element of the game I personally have no interest in anything that I have heard to date from dead players on either team,
The enemy are usually barracking and our own teams more often than not are either declaring me a noob for not supporting the suicidal endeavor which resulted in their demise or earnestly handing down the sort of tip which for me became apparent 20,000 battles ago.
Furthermore I can't type, this short text has taken me the best part of 10 minutes as I have the sort of manual dexterity one would usually associate with a litre of vodka so it is impossible for me to reply to any ingame chat whilst driving which is very frustrating.
Now that this thread is back on course I look forward to hearing all your reasoned arguments.
Regards
BodyGuardOfLies
IPaul72: No I thank you for making me a year younger 
But a note to all lets keep this as constructive as possible please
Over and out !
Kind Regards
IPaul72
But a note to all lets keep this as constructive as possible please
Over and out !
Kind Regards
IPaul72
Subject: Konwój! (22.10.2013)
Link on message: #6255526
RamzesIV, on 22 October 2013 - 05:26 PM, said: Mam rozumieć że bitwa będzie 28 vs 28?
Link on message: #6255526
RamzesIV, on 22 October 2013 - 05:26 PM, said: Mam rozumieć że bitwa będzie 28 vs 28?Gepard_PH: 15 vs 15 (o ile nie zabraknie uczestników)
Subject: Fun Cup: The Final Tankdown
Link on message: #6255400
mohammacl, on 21 October 2013 - 05:11 PM, said: ^ | how u wanna control teams ? i mean :if a team use 5 tier 10 and
one tier 5 what happend ? or any team have to use all 10 player ?
or what ?
Berbo, on 22 October 2013 - 09:16 AM, said: You get reported and disqualified, simple! 
You HAVE TO use 10 tanks: 1x Tier 1; 1x Tier 2 and so on.
Link on message: #6255400
mohammacl, on 21 October 2013 - 05:11 PM, said: ^ | how u wanna control teams ? i mean :if a team use 5 tier 10 and
one tier 5 what happend ? or any team have to use all 10 player ?
or what ?Hunter1911: One does not simply cheat Beardbo.
He's too stronK and will see through it!
He's too stronK and will see through it!
Berbo, on 22 October 2013 - 09:16 AM, said: You get reported and disqualified, simple! You HAVE TO use 10 tanks: 1x Tier 1; 1x Tier 2 and so on.
Hunter1911:
Subject: Fun Cup: The Final Tankdown
Link on message: #6255400
mohammacl, on 21 October 2013 - 05:11 PM, said: ^ | how u wanna control teams ? i mean :if a team use 5 tier 10 and
one tier 5 what happend ? or any team have to use all 10 player ?
or what ?
Berbo, on 22 October 2013 - 09:16 AM, said: You get reported and disqualified, simple! 
You HAVE TO use 10 tanks: 1x Tier 1; 1x Tier 2 and so on.
Link on message: #6255400
mohammacl, on 21 October 2013 - 05:11 PM, said: ^ | how u wanna control teams ? i mean :if a team use 5 tier 10 and
one tier 5 what happend ? or any team have to use all 10 player ?
or what ?TheKroo: One does not simply cheat Beardbo.
He's too stronK and will see through it!
He's too stronK and will see through it!
Berbo, on 22 October 2013 - 09:16 AM, said: You get reported and disqualified, simple! You HAVE TO use 10 tanks: 1x Tier 1; 1x Tier 2 and so on.
TheKroo:
Subject: Second Campaign Announced
Link on message: #6255161
Kantti, on 22 October 2013 - 04:46 PM, said: Are there any tier point limitations (like in company) or do we
just play with 15 t6, 15 t8 and 15 t10?
EDIT: and by the way, thanks for giving proper support and answers this time. Quite a difference compared to 1st campaign. Kudos.
diggyman, on 22 October 2013 - 04:49 PM, said: Here you say that its TOP 30 CLANS for EU
And here you state that its for 10 000 PLAYERS.
Who is gonna win the tank? Clans, players or both?
Link on message: #6255161
Kantti, on 22 October 2013 - 04:46 PM, said: Are there any tier point limitations (like in company) or do we
just play with 15 t6, 15 t8 and 15 t10?EDIT: and by the way, thanks for giving proper support and answers this time. Quite a difference compared to 1st campaign. Kudos.
Decept1on:
No points limit.
We are always working to improve ourselves :)
No points limit.
We are always working to improve ourselves :)
diggyman, on 22 October 2013 - 04:49 PM, said: Here you say that its TOP 30 CLANS for EUAnd here you state that its for 10 000 PLAYERS.
Who is gonna win the tank? Clans, players or both?
Decept1on:
Special Tank
The top 10,000 players who earn the largest amount of Fame Points in CW battles will be credited with a special Campaign tank, VK 72.01! In the case of players receiving an equal amount of Fame Points, the number of winners can be increased.
In-game Gold
The top 30 clans with the largest amount of Victory Points will receive in-game gold:
1st place – 1,000,000 gold to the clan treasury
2nd place – 500,000 gold to the clan treasury
3rd place – 300,000 gold to the clan treasury
4th-30th place – 100,000 gold to the clan treasury
Special Tank
The top 10,000 players who earn the largest amount of Fame Points in CW battles will be credited with a special Campaign tank, VK 72.01! In the case of players receiving an equal amount of Fame Points, the number of winners can be increased.
In-game Gold
The top 30 clans with the largest amount of Victory Points will receive in-game gold:
1st place – 1,000,000 gold to the clan treasury
2nd place – 500,000 gold to the clan treasury
3rd place – 300,000 gold to the clan treasury
4th-30th place – 100,000 gold to the clan treasury
Obirian
Großartige Neuigkeiten für T-Mobile und O2 Nutzern ! Aktion gilt nur für...
22.10.2013 18:51:52
Subject: Großartige Neuigkeiten für T-Mobile und O2 Nutzern ! Aktion gilt nur für...
Link on message: #6255145
t4r0x, on 22 October 2013 - 03:47 PM, said: Also ich weiß ja nicht wie es euch geht aber mich versuchen sie zu
verarschen geht garnicht........
vielen Dank für deine Geduld.
Das Angebot lautete kaufe zwei gleiche Pakete mit der Zahlungsmethode SMS und erhalte einen Gutschein für ein drittes Paket. Dies wurde so auch hier im Forum (http://forum.worldof...uer-kurze-zeit/) angekündigt. Eine Gutschrift kann hier deshalb nicht erfolgen. Den Gutschein hast du außerdem bereits eingelöst, somit ist das Angebot erfolgreich abgeschlossen worden.
Solltest du noch weitere Fragen haben, stehen wir dir jederzeit gerne zur Verfügung.
Weder Gold bekommen für den Gutschein noch die richtige hilfe so kann man potentielle Kunden auch prellen......
Link on message: #6255145
t4r0x, on 22 October 2013 - 03:47 PM, said: Also ich weiß ja nicht wie es euch geht aber mich versuchen sie zu
verarschen geht garnicht........vielen Dank für deine Geduld.
Das Angebot lautete kaufe zwei gleiche Pakete mit der Zahlungsmethode SMS und erhalte einen Gutschein für ein drittes Paket. Dies wurde so auch hier im Forum (http://forum.worldof...uer-kurze-zeit/) angekündigt. Eine Gutschrift kann hier deshalb nicht erfolgen. Den Gutschein hast du außerdem bereits eingelöst, somit ist das Angebot erfolgreich abgeschlossen worden.
Solltest du noch weitere Fragen haben, stehen wir dir jederzeit gerne zur Verfügung.
Weder Gold bekommen für den Gutschein noch die richtige hilfe so kann man potentielle Kunden auch prellen......
Obirian: Moin!
Ich habe deinen Fall noch mal an unser CS Team weitergeleitet und die Jungs schauen sich den Fall morgen noch mal an.
Gruß,
Obirian
Ich habe deinen Fall noch mal an unser CS Team weitergeleitet und die Jungs schauen sich den Fall morgen noch mal an.
Gruß,
Obirian
Subject: TNAC Recruitment Poster
Link on message: #6255067
Link on message: #6255067
Brynd: Looks cool! Good luck with your recruitment. 
Subject: Připravte se na nové tažení klanových válek!
Link on message: #6255066
Link on message: #6255066
Tuccy: ...Ovšem pro umístění se na žebříčku pro tanky budou mít velkou
výhodu ti, co budou v kampani už od začátku ;)
Subject: Locking and deleting topics
Link on message: #6255019
Volguus, on 22 October 2013 - 02:12 PM, said: Dear iScending, the rest of the community mods, and WG as a
whole.
By all means, lock threads that violate forum rules. However, please try to keep your responses to an acceptable level of credibility and professionalism. Even though I do think that a lot (read:most) of the users on this forum are whining and complaining, trolling and downright rude, that does not excuse your sinking down to their (I guess I should say "our") level.
The one thing that I do find unacceptable behaviour though, is the deletion of topics. This happened over the weekend with the lag posts, as well as today with that other debacle.
A formal response to threads would be great, even if it means locking 10 threads. But simply deleting them sends a very dangerous message: "we don't care what you think". I'm sure that that is not the case (quite the opposite actually), but the opinion is being enforced by your behaviour.
Kind regards,
A happily paying customer, who will keep paying, but would like the respect that a paying customer deserves.
Quote The one thing that I do find unacceptable behaviour though, is the deletion of topics. This happened over the weekend with the lag posts, as well as today with that other debacle.
A formal response to threads would be great, even if it means locking 10 threads. But simply deleting them sends a very dangerous message: "we don't care what you think". I'm sure that that is not the case (quite the opposite actually), but the opinion is being enforced by your behaviour.
Lord_Demon, on 22 October 2013 - 03:12 PM, said: My biggest problem with IScending is his speed. If I try to type a
bit longer reply to try people see reason instead of just trolling
or whining, I usually am unable to post it because he has locked
the thread while I typed. 
Not sure if even my longer posts would have added anything important to the thread, but I hate the lost efford.
Link on message: #6255019
Volguus, on 22 October 2013 - 02:12 PM, said: Dear iScending, the rest of the community mods, and WG as a
whole.By all means, lock threads that violate forum rules. However, please try to keep your responses to an acceptable level of credibility and professionalism. Even though I do think that a lot (read:most) of the users on this forum are whining and complaining, trolling and downright rude, that does not excuse your sinking down to their (I guess I should say "our") level.
The one thing that I do find unacceptable behaviour though, is the deletion of topics. This happened over the weekend with the lag posts, as well as today with that other debacle.
A formal response to threads would be great, even if it means locking 10 threads. But simply deleting them sends a very dangerous message: "we don't care what you think". I'm sure that that is not the case (quite the opposite actually), but the opinion is being enforced by your behaviour.
Kind regards,
A happily paying customer, who will keep paying, but would like the respect that a paying customer deserves.
IPaul72: Hello Volguus
Only the topics which violate the current rules set should be dealt with and locked however, sometimes mistakes are made.
About credibility and professionalism I can't really say more than I said in reply to a topic yesterday
iScending, he is a funny fella
but I can assure you he
does care and is like the rest of us here in the community team. He
plays the game and knows what we are facing, this is a common thing
that we discuss as a team. So hence the final
statement "walk among your people in disguise so as to
ascertain their true mood" we do and we try our best to represent
you all, but the book doesn't stop with the En team. We contact the
relevant people and they contact theirs then a decision is made
after hearing all the arguments measuring pro and cons. But we
always pass forward the suggestions be them good or bad

So in all we here value each and every opinion and try our best to make you all heard. This is why we ask such suggestions to be constructive and discussed in a reasonable manner, this makes handing feedback easier and more swift. Just about all of us are here because we care and want to see the best of the game. Also when something is noticed to be wrong we try to correct it. Sometimes people are too passionate about the changes, others see the light side (which is a good thing doesn't this mean they care any less) and some of us just sit back and see each side and take the reasonable approach. We are all approach things in a different way which is just perfect.
As a wise man once said:
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
Winston Churchill

However, iScending like myself and the rest of the community team here are not moderators, (sometimes we close and move topics) we are here to be your voice and also represent you as a whole.
If in the future you feel unfairly chastised you need to contact the moderations manager Mr_Kubrick. He will then investigate and take the appropriate actions needed.
But before contacting the moderations manager be sure this is the path you want to go down, he is a very busy fella and will investigate it to the death... this may result in someone having a very bad day.
Only the topics which violate the current rules set should be dealt with and locked however, sometimes mistakes are made.
About credibility and professionalism I can't really say more than I said in reply to a topic yesterday
iScending, he is a funny fella
So in all we here value each and every opinion and try our best to make you all heard. This is why we ask such suggestions to be constructive and discussed in a reasonable manner, this makes handing feedback easier and more swift. Just about all of us are here because we care and want to see the best of the game. Also when something is noticed to be wrong we try to correct it. Sometimes people are too passionate about the changes, others see the light side (which is a good thing doesn't this mean they care any less) and some of us just sit back and see each side and take the reasonable approach. We are all approach things in a different way which is just perfect.
As a wise man once said:
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
Winston Churchill
However, iScending like myself and the rest of the community team here are not moderators, (sometimes we close and move topics) we are here to be your voice and also represent you as a whole.
If in the future you feel unfairly chastised you need to contact the moderations manager Mr_Kubrick. He will then investigate and take the appropriate actions needed.
But before contacting the moderations manager be sure this is the path you want to go down, he is a very busy fella and will investigate it to the death... this may result in someone having a very bad day.
Quote The one thing that I do find unacceptable behaviour though, is the deletion of topics. This happened over the weekend with the lag posts, as well as today with that other debacle.
A formal response to threads would be great, even if it means locking 10 threads. But simply deleting them sends a very dangerous message: "we don't care what you think". I'm sure that that is not the case (quite the opposite actually), but the opinion is being enforced by your behaviour.
IPaul72: This as I see it from the quote above, is not acceptable either and
I will bring it to the attention of the powers that be. After all
like it has been said it doesn't send a good message and needs to
be dealt with.
But also on this note I have found that usually the moderator doing the actions puts a post in the topic at the end, stating why it was closed pointing the person in the right direction.
You can normally see these type of topics in the junkyard
Kind Regards
IPaul72
But also on this note I have found that usually the moderator doing the actions puts a post in the topic at the end, stating why it was closed pointing the person in the right direction.
You can normally see these type of topics in the junkyard
Kind Regards
IPaul72
Lord_Demon, on 22 October 2013 - 03:12 PM, said: My biggest problem with IScending is his speed. If I try to type a
bit longer reply to try people see reason instead of just trolling
or whining, I usually am unable to post it because he has locked
the thread while I typed. Not sure if even my longer posts would have added anything important to the thread, but I hate the lost efford.
IPaul72: Yep I agree you gotta be quick when he is on the scene he is like
quick draw McGraw sometimes 
http://s3.amazonaws...._mcgraw_gun.jpg
http://s3.amazonaws...._mcgraw_gun.jpg
Реклама | Adv















