Arms Race: Rules & Regulations
Дата: 23.05.2018 18:03:12
Mazhar_1980, on 22 May 2018 - 09:41 AM, said: In the trailer it says something like effect of clan success on
your personal score is reduced which means players from low rank
clans will have higher chance to win the reward tanks but I couldnt
understand how this works. I did side by side comparison of
operation gambit and arms race regulations but it looks like all
formulations, coefficients (calculation of clan fame points and
personel fame points) look all same: https://worldoftanks...e-regulations/ https://worldoftanks...bit-rules-regs/ Anyone
understand this time how tankers in low rank clans have better
chance to win reward tanks?
Mariuxszas, on 23 May 2018 - 09:04 AM, said: I dont understand why all the hate. I am very happy that WG decided to make small campaign this year. I love cw and the only reason i'm still playing this game is clan activity. I see only one questionable decision. Why small campaign rewards include the same tanks as big (december) campaign. I feel that tier 8 premium would be enough for this small campain. Of course my greedy self feels happy to be able to get tier10 reward tank much easier. Also i'd like to suggest for future to make smaller landing teams if possible. I mean if we atack a province, it takes 3-4 hours to reach owner and finish all battles. For me it is too long. I'd prefer more shorter landings. But overall i'm satisfied with this campaign and all rules and regulations.
voulezvous: The trailer talks about reducing the attractiveness of those
bonuses meaning the stronger clans might want to ignore then and
thus allow lesser clans to take advantage of them. You need to
remember that, just as with Gambit, your clan leader will have to
make some strategic choices during the event. It will be a
balancing act between how much Fame points to invest and how many
battles he can squeeze out of your clan mates. Not every action
will help you advance in the most optimal way. This is basically
what we wanted to achieve with lowering the attractiveness of some
of the bonuses - stronger clans might want to use their Fame points
in different ways fighting for the top positions while weaker clans
might want to use those to secure some lower but still rewarding
postion in the ranking.
Mariuxszas, on 23 May 2018 - 09:04 AM, said: I dont understand why all the hate. I am very happy that WG decided to make small campaign this year. I love cw and the only reason i'm still playing this game is clan activity. I see only one questionable decision. Why small campaign rewards include the same tanks as big (december) campaign. I feel that tier 8 premium would be enough for this small campain. Of course my greedy self feels happy to be able to get tier10 reward tank much easier. Also i'd like to suggest for future to make smaller landing teams if possible. I mean if we atack a province, it takes 3-4 hours to reach owner and finish all battles. For me it is too long. I'd prefer more shorter landings. But overall i'm satisfied with this campaign and all rules and regulations.
voulezvous: I'm glad to hear that CW is so important to you The operation is indeed a scaled
down version of last year's Gambit and as such offers similar
rewards. We did want to differentiate between the big Winter one
and this Spring event and this is why this time you only have 3
tanks to choose from. Thanks for your feedback on landing
team size. You're making a valid point. I'll make sure the devs
hear about it.
Arms Race: Rules & Regulations