The IS-3A Reborn!
Дата: 14.12.2018 17:40:14
Eaglax, on 13 December 2018 - 06:55 PM, said: #2 no I don't... and yea completely ignore the compare
part... and their opinion is not a "reason", it's a help to form my
own, and I never said that I would agree with them all the time....
and I seriously don't know what's so wrong about listening to
people who are much better and better informed? Why is that a bad
thing in your mind? and since you claim you answer
every question here we go again: now that many CC say what the
majority here said, am I not allowed to to share their opinion?
After watching their streams and youtube clips, and after coming
across one in 2 out of 3 matches, am I not allowed to judge them a
bit? Does one really have to buy one, oh excuse me, I meant, do I
have to gamble to get on, in order to be allowed to say anything
about it? How many data sets and how many examples do I need
personally, so I'm allowed to say that the "inverse autoreloader"
on the IS-3A is imho utter garbage and broken? eekeeboo: There's nothing wrong with listening to other people, but
like I said, when I said reserve judgment on something until you
have more experience or there's more information, it's important to
use just a minor sample of information and data. You
can judge, you can have your opinion. But that does not make it a
fact. You've made a statement more than a question. You can share
their opinions and judgments of course. But there's a difference
between saying: X cc states that the tank is strong/OP
because of x, y and z facts. Vs the things I asked people to
withhold judgment until there's more information like this
statement: "Another premium OP *********, just what the game
needed. Tx WG for making it easy to leave game. "
So when you say something is OP without having any
first-hand experience either playing or facing in numerous
situations. The difference is "It looks OP because...." and "It is
OP because...." I hope this clarifies the distinction?
Mourning76, on 13 December 2018 - 07:05 PM, said: You have seen the reviews of virtually ALL OTHER community
contributors and youtubers who have this vehicle, I assume? How
would you say this vehicle was received by them? Were they on the
whole positive? Did they on average think this was a well balanced
tank? Were they happy with this BROKEN AF tank? I have yet to see
ONE positive review of this vehicle by a serious cc or youtuber.eekeeboo: I've seen a fair few yes, and the belief is the vehicle is
OP so far. But I am a very logical person, I remember all the hype,
doom and gloom about previous releases, I would rather wait to see
how the tank performs in more situations and then go from there.
Right now the trend is to say OP, not everyone has it, generally
the reviews go through a cycle of hype, counter-hype, analysis and
then post analysis.
Mourning76, on 13 December 2018 - 08:01 PM, said: QB's newestvideo which was just posted on youtube. Link: https://m.youtube.co...h?v=g4FsmkMVamgOn the lootboxes and IS3A, care to respond to his video, eekeeboo?
eekeeboo: I have my opinions, the first thing I would say is that
probability doesn't work the way shown in the video. Further points
in the video that QB was right about is that we will, of course,
emphasise the crates are not meant for getting tier 8's but to
garner the gold and premium time and other primary rewards with the
vehicles as an additional bonus. With the gold from the crates you
will especially find a use this year with the advent calendar
offers to be available for gold, you may not be interested in all
of them, but at least the option is there. I believe as always, it
is up to each individual how they spend their money, if they want
to spend it on boxes like those for Christmas, then that is their
choice.
Nazgarth, on 13 December 2018 - 11:19 PM, said: Unless your driving an IS3A...eekeeboo: The IS-3a has the same weakspots as the IS3 and will receive
a hard spanking if you sit there to take damage, especially with
the stock IS3 turret.
ChimPANGzee, on 13 December 2018 - 11:51 PM, said: Has anyone heard about an official response to this monumental
backlash? I believe that I am not alone in wanting an answer
and soon, considering how the community spearheaded by the CC's
have voiced our anger! WG: Man up and do something, if
nothing else say that you stand by your business practice and
you're not doing anything since you consider that nothing needs to
be done. @Eekeeboo do you have any authority to do or say
anything else but tell us that we can't judge a tank before playing
it? We know you're just doing your job, so one could expect
the English Community Manager to be able to interact with the
community.... PS: On a side note, not a chance that
most of us are going to be able to do anything but judging the book
by it's cover since we are NOT going to spend insane amounts of
hard earned cash for the pixel flavour of the month.eekeeboo: I can tell you we have gathered as much feedback as there
is, and I mean all of it. I've passed it on and continue to do
so. The answer so far is that it is better to wait for
more information and data on the performance of the vehicle over
more situations etc. My authority as a CM is that I
can gather your feedback, pass it on and share how not only you
feel but how other members feel in places like FB, Reddit, Discords
etc. I'm not saying that you must play it to judge it,
but once you've had the time to face it and look at its weaknesses
and strengths and see how you perform.
Neno, on 14 December 2018 - 12:57 AM, said: This is a very big fiasco in the end of the year... I mean if every
Comunity contributor is angry about the changes on IS3A and
how you can get it... and some of them even uninstalled WOT ( WG CC
- 4TankersAndDog ) for the same reason, what more data and
constructive advice do you actually need? Don't you see
what you did.... so let me get this straight ... you are
playing IS3A and pressing W, and you are shooting like John F.
Rambo and when you are empty you have reload like normal
IS3... and basically you are clipping T8, T7 and T6 tanks like they
are nothing... Image this... IS3A vs IS3... in 16 seconds IS3 is
dead.... and how much shells can IS3 output 1-2 ?? and now
imagine strongholds with few IS3A vs teams that
are without premium tanks... ... #RipDreams .... do you
need more constructive data about what is going to happen in T8 CW
or even strongholds, do you get the point of how powerful is
that tank is ?? So basicly... let me get this topic with
more constructive data...:CC - QB - made a video about IS3A CC - Skill4ltu - made a video about IS3A CC- 4TankersAndDog - made a video about IS3A and Lootboxes + uninstalled WOT CC- DezGames - made a video about IS3A and Lootboxes and even made a comment on one of the QB comment section CC - Circonflexes - made a video about IS3A CC- Orzanel - made a video about IS3A etc...etc... If every Community Contributor is saying the same about IS3A what do you expect from the player base to get as a message ?? and the best part: You can get IS3A ONLY from loot boxes ( I am sry for Belgium players ) I mean.. what are you trying to achieve, happy players ??
eekeeboo: I understand the current amount of information that points
in a direction, but at the same time, I have to ask, have there
been instances in the past where there were similar levels of
"hype" that turned out to be unfounded. I am too also aware that
sometimes the hype was also justified. It's just that I am of
course always going to advocate informed judgment over prejudgment
any time. 15:45 Added after 5 minutes
laulaur, on 14 December 2018 - 10:34 AM, said: The irony of you not being capable of reading a [edited]
simple graph, yet you still spam nonsense about balancing...
IS-3A, Defender, Skorpion, E25, lefefefe are all OP and/or broken
tanks - and WG use them as a bait for people to buy more boxes.
That is all. No one from WG gives a crap about balancing as long as
they make tons of money.eekeeboo: Please read above, it's not being about not able to read a
"simple" graph but the fact the graph isn't even remotely
valid.
The IS-3A Reborn!